Skip to main content

Bruce Bennett/2006 Getty Images

Former NHL defenceman Craig Rivet was featured in an item in Monday's Look Ahead page and there is a much longer piece on him that is worth pursuing.

Rivet, who finished off a four-year contract worth $14-million (all currency U.S.) last season and found no NHL takers for his services, is now making $850 a week in the ECHL, two rungs below the big league. But he says he couldn't be happier.

My pal Bucky Gleason of The Buffalo News has the story and it's a good read. It's also a look at a bit of a phenomenon in recent years, the athlete who can comfortably finish out his playing days at a lower level without the pressure to perform that comes with a job in the NHL because he has no financial worries.

Story continues below advertisement

Back in the day, a staple of the sports writing game was the feature on the washed-up big leaguer who fell all the way down to the low minor leagues. Those stories were all about the quiet desperation of an aging player who wanted to get back to the big time and the big money.

Hockey was slower to come to the big money than the other professional sports. But in the last 15 years or so there's been a rise in what you could call the leisure class – ex-players who don't need to earn a living when their NHL career ends.

Funny thing, though. People like Rivet are still relatively rare, those who play simply for the fun of it. While there are quite a few ex-NHLers playing in the American Hockey League, almost all of them are playing out the final years of a big-money contract an NHL general manager gave them. There are also lots playing in the European leagues but the money there is much better than in the ECHL, where the average salary is $620 a week.



Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter