Skip to main content

Goalie Roberto Luongo #1of the Vancouver Canucks looses sight of the puck as it flys by the net during the first period in NHL action against the Minnesota Wild on March 14, 2011 at Rogers Arena in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

Rich Lam/2011 Getty Images

We're all of eight games into the playoffs, so you don't want to draw too many conclusions. But after eight, with one played in each series, the story has been the goalies and just how difficult it's been to put the puck in the net.

There were only eight goals in the three games last night, making for just 27 goals - including one empty-netter - in the eight games so far.

Again, very small sample size, but that's 3.38 goals per game after averaging 5.46 during the year. Goaltenders have an incredible .949 save percentage, with Carey Price, Roberto Luongo, Ryan Miller and Marc-Andre Fleury all picking up shutouts.

Story continues below advertisement

Only 1.50 pucks have gone in for every 30 shots on goal.

The playoffs are generally lower scoring than the regular season, usually by as much as half a goal per game, but this is obviously lower than expected. And it's probably fair to expect that the goals will start going in soon.

One theory I heard floated out there last night after all of these big nights by name goalies is that this might be "the return of the big money goalie" after so many teams have been skimping on what they're paying their netminders.

A closer look reveals a lot of low salaried ones playing well.

Here's a breakdown of what the playoff teams (ranked by points) are paying their current No. 1 in terms of a cap hit:

  1. Vancouver, Roberto Luongo: $5.33-million (9th highest)
  2. Washington, Michal Neuvirth: $821,667 (not in top 50)
  3. Philadelphia, Sergei Bobrovsky: $1.75-million (30th)
  4. Pittsburgh, Marc-Andre Fleury: $5-million (T-11th)
  5. San Jose, Antti Niemi: $2-million (T-24th)
  6. Detroit, Jimmy Howard: $716,667 (not in top 50)
  7. Boston, Tim Thomas: $5-million (T-11th)
  8. Tampa Bay, Dwayne Roloson: $2.5-million (22nd)
  9. Anaheim, Dan Ellis: $1.5-million (T-32nd)
  10. Nashville, Pekka Rinne: $3.4-million (20th)
  11. Phoenix, Ilya Bryzgalov: $4.25-million (15th)
  12. Los Angeles, Jon Quick: $1.8-million (29th)
  13. Chicago, Corey Crawford: $800,000 (not in top 50)
  14. Montreal, Carey Price: $2.75-million (21st)
  15. Buffalo, Ryan Miller: $6.25-million (3rd)
  16. NY Rangers, Henrik Lundqvist: $6.875-million (1st)

Worth noting about that list? Look at how many of the 20 highest paid goaltenders in the NHL aren't even on it.

Jonas Hiller gets an exemption because he's hurt and would obviously be playing for the Ducks if he was able to, but consider these names who aren't even playing right now:

Story continues below advertisement

Cam Ward, J-S Giguere, Niklas Backstrom, Mikka Kiprusoff, Tomas Vokoun, Cristobal Huet, Martin Brodeur, Rick DiPietro, Pascal Leclaire, Nikolai Khabibulin, Jaroslav Halak, Kari Lehtonen.

That's 60 per cent of the highest paid 20 goalies, all who make more than $3.5-million, and a good indication of how some big dollar, long-term goalie contracts can turn out only a few years after they were signed.

Meanwhile, there are a ton of low salaried goaltenders who played very well this season, including four rookies in Neuvirth, Bobrovsky, Crawford and James Reimer.

In other words, it's hard to pull a trend out of goaltender salaries other than, if you're going to pay a netminder a lot, you better make sure it's the right one.

So far, those in the playoffs are earning their money.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter