Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

In this file photo the NHL logo is seen on a goal.

Mark Humphrey/The Associated Press

The two sides are getting closer, but there still remains a significant gap.

The NHL's latest offer of an across the board 50-50 split over the life of a new agreement moves them some $300- to $400-million closer to where the NHLPA's last proposal came in, depending on how league revenues grow in the future.

Growth is a big wild card in these two offers. If it's high, as with the 7.1 per cent the union forecasts, these two proposals are just $110-million apart per season over the next five years.

Story continues below advertisement

But if it's low, as with the 5 per cent the league forecasts, they are $200-million apart per season.

The last time we presented these numbers here, it was based on the 7.1 per cent growth factor, as that's what the NHL has enjoyed under the last collective bargaining agreement.

We'll stick with that here to make comparisons easy (note that the 2011-12 figures have adjusted slightly due to new data from the league) but keep in mind the divide is likely a bit larger than what's here:

  

NHLPA offer

 

League revenues

Players share

Percentage

2011-12

$3,303.0

$1,883.0

57.0%

    

2012-13

$3,537.5

$1,920.7

54.3%

2013-14

$3,788.7

$1,997.5

52.7%

2014-15

$4,057.7

$2,117.3

52.2%

2015-16

$4,345.8

$2,272.9

52.3%

2016-17

$4,654.3

$2,439.5

52.4%

    

Total (2012-17)

$20,383.9

$10,747.9

52.7%

  

NHL offer

  
 

League revenues

Players share

Percentage

 

Difference

2011-12

$3,303.0

$1,883.0

57.0%

 

--

      

2012-13

$3,537.5

$1,768.8

50.0%

 

$151.9

2013-14

$3,788.7

$1,894.3

50.0%

 

$103.1

2014-15

$4,057.7

$2,028.8

50.0%

 

$88.5

2015-16

$4,345.8

$2,172.9

50.0%

 

$100.0

2016-17

$4,654.3

$2,327.2

50.0%

 

$112.4

      

Total (2012-17)

$20,383.9

$10,192.0

50.0%

 

$555.9

Now, there are all kinds of caveats in there.

For one, the league is proposing a six-year deal, meaning the savings they would get go beyond the existing five-year proposal we have from the PA.

Also, as noted earlier, if revenues don't grow at that quick a rate, we're much, much further apart. Without the rise of the Canadian dollar, for example, NHL revenues have only grown at a 6.3 per cent pace over the previous seven seasons.

So getting to 7.1 per cent without that bump may not even be possible.

Story continues below advertisement

That said, this gives you a good idea of how close we are getting on the basic financial details involved in these negotiations. The PA has clearly shown a willingness to come down into the 52 or 53 per cent range in its existing offer, and it's believed they have another proposal at the ready to put down on Thursday in negotiations.

The thing is, while you've heard all along that the percentage is the single biggest hurdle to getting a deal done, there are many other factors involved, and some of the things the players really won't like about the league's latest offer fall into that category.

Because there's a lot there, I'll get into some of those issues in another post. But this gives you a general sense of the dollars involved and what's changed since last month's offers.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies