Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Brendan Shanahan didn't want Phil Kessel.

There's really no other way to read into what happened on Canada Day than that. The Toronto Maple Leafs went into the two weeks after the Stanley Cup final if not hell-bent then at least incredibly determined to trade their top scorer.

Even if the return was underwhelming. As it was.

Story continues below advertisement

Kasperi Kapanen is a fine prospect. You always want to add first-round picks, too – although preferably they wouldn't be as heavily lottery protected as the one the Leafs got from Pittsburgh is. And who knows on Scott Harrington, a 22-year-old defensive prospect whose career screams NHL-AHL tweener?

But combined with the fact the Leafs (a) will have $8.4-million of Kessel's salary on their cap the next seven years and (b) that they threw in a second-round pick and (c) that they didn't get one of the Penguins top two prospects (defencemen Olli Maatta and Derrick Pouliot) and (d) they paid Kessel's $4-million bonus on July 1, well, let's just say the return here was not substantial.

They gave and gave and gave until the Penguins got their choices on nitpicky conditions to protect the picks and salary dumps to help their cap situation.

There's little indication Toronto tried to work with Kessel and expand his no-trade clause, as they had with other players late last season.

There's little indication he was shopped extensively to all 29 other teams, using the media to drum up interest, which hasn't been Shanahan's style.

The talk with the Kessel trade was almost exclusively Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh… and then he went to the Penguins.

It's not hard to see why Shanahan didn't admire what he saw in Kessel. As players, they couldn't be more different. In fact, most of the league couldn't be more different than Kessel.

Story continues below advertisement

He's an anomaly – an odd duck that has such remarkable natural athletic gifts that for him succeeding was never about the typical "look like you care" mentality that permeates hockey.

Kessel cared, but he cared in his own weird Kessel way. He wanted to win, but he wasn't the kind of player who could bleed on the ice in an obvious lost cause – like the end of last season – night after night.

But he was beloved by a lot of his teammates in Toronto because they could see something there in his awkward silences and occasional jokes. They could also see his incredible talent, every day.

"Any sport you want to play him in, he'll beat you at," teammate Joffrey Lupul once said.

Did Phil Kessel have some flaws as a Leaf? Did he deserve some blame? Absolutely.

But he also never should have been set up to be more than what he was, which is a quiet, unassuming winger who isn't good defensively and who can score goals better than almost anybody on the planet.

Story continues below advertisement

You talk to people in Wisconsin, and that's what Kessel was when he was 13 or 14 years old. That's what he was when he moved to the U.S. national development team as a teenager and that's what he was as a rookie with the Boston Bruins back in 2006.

He bombed his draft interviews; he slipped to fifth, despite having the point totals of a No. 1 overall pick.

He was always a bad fit for Toronto – and especially for this Toronto: a talent-bereft team that became mired in a mindless non-rebuilding rebuild, one without a proper No. 1 centre or No. 1 defenceman and built heavy on wingers without defensive ability.

He was the centrepiece of a team with no centre, no real direction or future.

That he kept producing in that mess is part of the anomaly; that he was expected to do any more than that, given his background, is absurd.

Kessel is what he is. He is what he was when Brian Burke foolishly bet the farm on him back in 2009; he is what he was when his coaches in Ann Arbor tried in vain to get him to backcheck and forecheck and do everything else they'd come to expect from eager top prospects.

Story continues below advertisement

"I said to him 'You need to be a well-rounded player,' " said David Quinn, Kessel's coach with USA Hockey in those early years. "He looked at me with this bewildered look and said 'Well I'll just go out and get another goal.' "

More than 10 years later, that's still Kessel.

It would have been fascinating to see Mike Babcock try to work with him next season, to have one of the undisputed top coaches in the game attempt to reach Kessel in a way no coach ever has.

In a lost season, with nothing to lose but games the Leafs won't care they lost, it could have worked. It also could have been a disaster, with in-fighting and benchings and all kinds of sordid headlines during what will already be a trying year next season.

Who knows?

Shanahan thinks he does. He spent a year watching Kessel, inside and out, and like many in the hockey world, he wasn't impressed. Kessel didn't fit what he was looking for, despite all the goals, and he certainly didn't answer his challenge in midseason when Randy Carlyle was fired.

Story continues below advertisement

Shanahan asked his team to show him their character; they turned in one of the worst performances in recent NHL history, ultimately winning 11 of their final 51 games.

Predictably, Kessel didn't rah-rah them to another empty 85-point season that would have – in the long run – been more catastrophic than the catastrophe that actually unfolded.

Predictably, Kessel was still Kessel.

"This wasn't about singling out one guy or trying to pin the blame on one guy," Shanahan said on Wednesday.

That's true – it's not. Others will be thrown overboard with far less fanfare. But since he arrived six years ago, Kessel has always been the man atop the pyramid in Toronto, the player expected to drive a terribly run team's hole-filled roster to greater heights.

But that's not what he is.

Story continues below advertisement

That's never what he was.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies