Skip to main content

The issue is not only the coach. The issue is the Leafs built their team around Kessel, Phaneuf and not much else

Marianne Helm/Getty Images

When Phil Kessel landed in Toronto on Sept. 18, 2009, he came by way of the Boston Bruins, a team that had 116 points the year before to lead the Eastern Conference.

Not a strong defensive player, Kessel nonetheless led the team in goals (36), was fourth among forwards in ice time and had a 53-per-cent possession rating.

He brought those strengths – and flaws – to the Leafs.

Story continues below advertisement

When Dion Phaneuf landed in Toronto on Jan. 31, 2010, he came by way of the Calgary Flames, a team that had never missed the playoffs in his four years there.

Not a strong defensive player, Phaneuf nonetheless averaged 52 points a season, led the team in ice time and had a 53-per-cent possession rating.

He brought those strengths – and flaws – to the Leafs.

Five years later, not much has changed.

The Leafs had one of their worst games of the season on Saturday in Winnipeg, as the Jets embarrassed them 5-1 while heavily dominating the shot clock. It was the Leafs seventh regulation loss in their past nine games, and they face one of the most difficult stretches of their season here over the next two weeks, with road games in some of the toughest Western Conference cities.

More than anyone else, Kessel and Phaneuf have been blamed for the slide and, really, all of Toronto's failings of the past few seasons.

On better coached teams, with more secondary talent, they fit in and filled a role.

Story continues below advertisement

On this one, where the systemic flaws are so immense and the supporting talent less, they're continually asked to do too much and end up wearing their flaws more nights than not.

Beyond the coach and what's obviously a possession-bereft style of play, what ails the Leafs remains the same as the day Mats Sundin left in 2008.

They don't have a No. 1 centre.

They also lack a No. 1 defenceman.

And repeatedly asking Kessel and Phaneuf to be more than they are – to be something, in fact, they never were – without those pieces is as foolish as anything that's gone on around the organization in the past decade.

Especially when the problems with the Leafs' core go well beyond those two players. This is a team with Tyler Bozak playing 19 minutes a night as the top-line centre against top competition and getting outshot more than almost any player in the league.

Story continues below advertisement

Other key contributors lack defensive acumen – including James van Riemsdyk, Joffrey Lupul and Jake Gardiner – and there's a $5.25-million (U.S.) winger named David Clarkson playing third-line minutes who's on pace for 27 points.

Stéphane Robidas, who signed a three-year deal for $9-million in July to play in the top four, has been a healthy scratch in favour of minor-leaguer Korbinian Holzer.

And on and on (and on).

The issue is not only the coach. The issue is the Leafs built their team around Kessel, Phaneuf and not much else because they were the impact players that former GM Brian Burke was able to get without going through the draft or free agency, routes he deemed too slow or too costly.

They were available because they had flaws; unsurprisingly, they still have them.

And you can blame those who have ignored that for too long for part of the Leafs' downfall.

Story continues below advertisement

The tough part is how president Brendan Shanahan should go about fixing this roster. You can't give away talent for nothing in this league, and freeing up cap space without anything to spend it on hardly makes sense unless it's a total teardown, something he said last spring he wasn't interested in.

Even so, getting younger makes sense, as does adding prospects that will mature with players such as Nazem Kadri and Morgan Rielly.

It'll take some boldness from the brass to start selling now, but it'll be long overdue.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter