Skip to main content

Hockey helmets are seen in this file photo.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

The moderates on the player side have had their say. Now the more militant members of the National Hockey League Players' Association could get their chance to weigh in.

And the word players talk about more and more is decertification.

"Blow it up," one wrote in a text message on Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Decertifying the union has until now been considered an extreme option by players, but it has been one that NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr has informed them about in recent days.

Last week, when players were considering the league's demands for a new proposal, Fehr gave them three options:

Capitulate and accept the NHL's latest offer;

Continue negotiating;

Decertify, just as the NFL and NBA unions did during their lockouts last year.

There was no support for the first option among players on the conference call. Option two, however, had much of the backing, putting No. 3 on the back burner as the NHLPA pursued an agreement on Wednesday in a lengthy meeting with the league in New York.

On hand to help craft the proposal earlier this week were veteran players believed to be moderates like Vinny Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis, Andy McDonald and Shawn Horcoff, among others.

Story continues below advertisement

The players' offer of a 50-per-cent share along with $393-million (all currency U.S.) in additional "make whole" money, however, was rebuffed by the league, as commissioner Gary Bettman and the owners declined to offer any concessions in response.

The two sides are now only $182-million apart over the life of a new five-year agreement, although several contracting issues remain outstanding and may be the largest impediments to a deal.

"I think it's frustrating for everybody and disappointing for everybody that it's taken this long and we're still far apart," Bettman said.

Bettman said the league was losing up to $20-million a day.

"I will tell you the question players ask me, which is 'where is their reciprocity in the bargaining process on the other side?'" Fehr countered. "It's pretty hard to find it."

If players voted to decertify, the NHLPA would no longer serve as a bargaining unit, and the lockout would either end or have its legality challenged in an antitrust lawsuit.

Story continues below advertisement

In the spring of 2011, NFL players did just that when they dissolved their union and pursued an antitrust lawsuit before their lockout had even begun. That fall, after a lockout that lasted more than four months, the National Basketball Players' Association followed suit.

Both leagues eventually came to an agreement through negotiations, with the decertification and legal action (or potential legal action) believed to have helped force the two sides into a deal.

In the case of the NBA, the players had a new deal 12 days after their decertification vote went through.

The value of professional athletes having a union has become a subject of debate in sports law circles the past few years, as owners have used labour stoppages to shrink players' share of revenues.

Without a union to negotiate with, a league couldn't have a collective agreement, which would mean basic elements of the league, such as the salary cap, could be challenged under antitrust laws.

"Now, the purpose of the union is not so much to prevent exploitation, but it's really to protect the owners," Ron Klempner, associate general counsel of the NBPA, said in May. "The purpose of decertification, if we do it the next time, will be because the collective-bargaining process has pretty much run its course in professional sports," he added.

Story continues below advertisement

It's not certain the NHLPA will choose decertification, but support is building among players after their latest offer was rejected so swiftly.

Despite that growing animosity, the two sides are expected to talk again on Friday, even as the all-star game and another two weeks of regular-season games are expected to be cancelled in the next two days. But optimism is in short supply on either side.

Asked Wednesday about the possibility of the NHLPA holding a decertification vote, a union spokesman said only that they would "decline commenting on potential next steps."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter