Skip to main content

Vancouver Canucks Daniel and Henrik Sedin have responded to comments by Versus analyst Mike Milbury. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

Darryl Dyck/CP

The 2011 Stanley Cup playoffs have been a microcosm of their careers.

There's been some good, some outstanding, some bad and some disappearing acts, and yet the end result is what it always is with the Sedin twins: productive.

Criticized in the second-round for no-showing against the Nashville Predators, and against the Chicago Blackhawks for becoming a defensive liability, Vancouver Canucks forward Henrik Sedin emerged Monday as the NHL's leading playoff scorer after a four-assist performance against the San Jose Sharks in Game 4.

Story continues below advertisement

He has 19 points in 17 games, and led four players, including his brother, by two points prior to Monday's Game 5 of the Eastern Conference final. Daniel Sedin, meanwhile, has eight goals, which trailed only Tampa Bay Lightning forward Sean Bergenheim among playoff scorers, with a league-high five coming on the power play.

With the Canucks leading the Sharks 3-1 in the best-of-seven Western Conference final, and having a chance Tuesday to clinch a berth in the Stanley Cup final with a win, the Sedins have jumped back into the Conn Smythe Trophy debate. They've been dominant against San Jose, combining for 15 points in four games after netting just seven points in a six-game series against the Predators.

"In the regular season, you've got 82 games, and there is going to be ups and downs," said Henrik, who has set club records for assists in a playoff game, series and season this spring. "Good teams find ways to win and move on, and then you're going to get a chance to redeem yourself. And that's what we've had this year."

Undoubtedly, had the Canucks dropped that dramatic Game 7 to the Blackhawks in the first round, the progress the Sedin brothers has made as playoff performers over the last three years would have been lost. They would've been back at square one - terrific producers during the season, but not suited for postseason hockey.

Just two weeks ago, they were hearing they didn't have another gear, that because neither is fleet afoot, their playoff potential was limited to half-court offence on the power play and on the rare occasions when Vancouver could set up in the opponent's zone at even strength.

Of course, none of that rattled them. The Sedins have been punching bags for years, and yet their demeanours never change.

"We believe in ourselves," Henrik said when asked how the twins have turned it around against the Sharks. "We believe even though maybe everyone on the outside hasn't. We believe that we're good players, and we're playoff players, and that we can show up in big games."

Story continues below advertisement

There's a reason for this scoring outburst.

The Predators stacked the blueline, forced the Canucks to dump and chase, and took few chances on the offensive end. The Sharks, conversely, want to play a puck-possession style and take more chances, which plays right into the twins' hands.

"They're a good defensive team, don't get me wrong," Henrik said. "But they got guys who want to score."

For their teammates and coaches, criticisms of the Sedins this spring - or over their decade in Vancouver - have been "unfair," according to defenceman Sami Salo. Vancouver head coach Alain Vigneault did his best to sugarcoat their performance against the Preds, and the twins weren't exactly hard on themselves, clinging to the mantra that they were generating chances, just not finishing.

That was the public line, and yet almost every time the Canucks took to the practice sheet, you could bank on one of the twins, if not both, being the first ones on the ice, working to get back to the high standard they're held to.

"They've got a great mindset," goaltender Roberto Luongo said. "They don't let anything affect them. Obviously, [reporters]don't see them in everyday life, and outside the rink, but they're always in a good mood. Always even-keeled … they don't let that stuff affect them. They know they have talent, and they keep working."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter