Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Detroit Red Wings celebrate their victory over the Chicago Blackhawks (Paul Sancya/AP)
Detroit Red Wings celebrate their victory over the Chicago Blackhawks (Paul Sancya/AP)


Wings look a far better team now than they did in March Add to ...

The Detroit Red Wings remind me of the protagonists in one of those cheesy 1950s-style Dracula movies. You know the kind. Someone has a chance to kill off the Count early, fails to do so – and all sorts of mayhem subsequently ensues.

The Red Wings were like that with a week to go in the regular season – on the cusp of missing the playoffs for the first time in 22 years. Somebody just had to come in and finish them off when they were down and out, and couldn’t. The end result is what you see right now, a team very much alive in the Stanley Cup playoffs and threatening to knock out the President’s Trophy-winning Chicago Blackhawks in the second round.

After eliminating the No. 2 seeded Anaheim Ducks in the opening round, the Red Wings pulled ahead in their series against the Blackhawks Monday night with a 3-1 win at the Joe Louis Arena in the only game on the schedule.

There were a couple of controversial moments in the game (more on that later), but the bottom line is, for the second game in a row, the Red Wings were the better team. Anaheim had them on the ropes in the previous series – up 3-2 – but Detroit won a pair of elimination games. After getting spanked in the opener, a loss that you could attribute mostly to the fatigue of going seven games in the opening round, the Red Wings have recovered nicely from that setback and look like the far more poised team.

Most of the good things that have happened to the Red Wings since they made that 11th hour push towards the playoffs could be attributed to the play of their top forwards, Henrik Zetterberg and Pavel Datsyuk, who’ve been great. But the Game 3 victory was mostly keyed by the bottom two lines, which contributed two goals 31 seconds apart in the middle period to break up a scoreless tie.

From there, Detroit did what good, experienced teams do – and kept the Blackhawks at bay. Playoff officiating has been front-and-centre this post-season and there were two calls, one each way, that influenced the direction of the game in the third period. On the first, Red Wings’ forward Johan Franzen was wiped out by a check from behind deep in the Blackhawks zone by defenceman Niklas Hjalmarsson. With Franzen down and out, the Blackhawks scored on the counter attack, Duncan Keith putting Patrick Kane in behind the defence for his second goal of the post-season.

Could Hjalmarsson have been called for a penalty there? Coach Mike Babcock thought so. But moments later, the Red Wings also benefited from a close call that went their way – a goal by Viktor Stalberg wiped out when it was determined Andrew Shaw had interfered with goaltender Jimmy Howard. Shaw actually made no contact whatsoever but he was camped out in the crease, which is technically a violation – one that rarely gets called anymore. Blackhawks goalie Corey Crawford figured it was the first time since about 2000 that a goal was disallowed for a foot in the crease – he must have been thinking of Brett Hull, Dallas Stars, 1999, against the Buffalo Sabres. Blackhawks’ coach Joel Quenneville said it was the turning point, given that Stalberg’s goal would have tied the score and shifted the momentum their way. Instead, Franzen made a good play on a subsequent rush, fed Datsyuk for a laser-shot that skipped in and out of the net in the blink of an eye, and the two-goal lead was enough of a cushion for the Red Wings the rest of the way.

You can pretty much complain about the refereeing every night if you want to, because the game is so fast, the refs do not have the benefit of multiple replays and even if they did, not everybody agrees, even after the fact, what the right call might have been. Kings’ coach Darryl Sutter made a reference to that the other day. He basically finds it’s a waste of time to argue about, or criticize the referees. His contention is that his team needs to take three or fewer penalties in every game. If they do, they usually win.

Even though they are bruising, hard-hitting, L.A. does a good job mostly of staying out of the penalty box. Sutter has been around long enough to know that officiating is a factor in the game, the same way as defensive zone turnovers and or superlative saves are factors in the game.

It’s hard to dispute the fact that as decently as Crawford played in goal for Chicago, Howard’s performance for the Red Wings – 39 saves on 40 shots – made him a difference-maker in the game.

Report Typo/Error
Single page

Follow on Twitter: @eduhatschek

Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular