Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

South Korea's Shin A Lam reacts after being defeated by Germany's Britta Heidemann (not seen) during their women's epee individual semifinal fencing competition at the ExCel venue at the London 2012 Olympic Games July 30, 2012.

FABRIZIO BENSCH/Reuters

South Korea's A Lam Shin returned to the fencing piste on Monday after making a one-hour protest against a controversial judge's call that had cost her the chance of a gold medal.

Shin was physically escorted off the piste after her team argued against the award of a winning touch to Germany's Britta Heidemann in the epee semi-final.

Heidemann ran off screaming with joy after the initial awarding of the touch but was then called back to await the final decision of the judge.

Story continues below advertisement

The defending champion from Germany later went on to lose the final to Ukrainian Yana Shemyakina while Shin was beaten 15-11 by top seed Sun Yujie of China in the bronze-medal match.

After initial discussions resulted in Heidemann being awarded the final touch in the semi-final, a stunned Shin did not move.

The Korean did not leave the piste as this would have indicated she accepted the decision of the judge, Austrian Barbara Csar. By staying, Shin was exercising her rights under the rules.

An indelible image of Shin will linger in the memory, a 25-year old looking dejected as she sits on a dramatically spot-lit piste, pristine in her white uniform with a towel draped over her shoulder.

The Korean was also surrounded by 7,000 screaming spectators, many unsure what was happening.

Her coach, Shim Jaesung, lodged a written complaint that was ultimately rejected by the FIE (Federation International d'Escrime), fencing's governing body.

"I did everything I could," Shim said in an interview with Reuters while standing outside the FIE's office at the ExCel Centre.

Story continues below advertisement

Executive members of the FIE board were meeting late into the night discussing the contents of a statement due for release on Tuesday.

"They said your fencer has to continue the match so I had to accept the decision," said Shim.

"Shin told me, 'I am okay', but I fear she is not okay," added the drained-looking coach who also sits on the FIE rules committee.

Germany's fencing delegation head, Manfred Kaspar, and Shim were seen having calm discussions while the officials deliberated.

"I completely agree with my colleague from Korea's decision to make a protest against a refereeing decision. We are not angry," said Kaspar.

While the tip of a fencing blade is widely considered the second fastest moving object in sport, behind a marksman's bullet, in the match between Shin and Heidemann there were at least three separate actions while a single second remained on the clock.

Story continues below advertisement

The row erupted when two double-touches were recorded with a second to go and Shin thought she had triumphed. But a single second was put back on the clock after some discussions.

Heidemann then unleashed a blistering surge forward, hitting Shin while also avoiding her blade.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies