Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Mikhail Kukushkin of Kazakhstan reacts during the singles final of the International Tennis Tournamen St. Petersburg Open 2010 match against Mikhail Youzhny of Russia at the Petersburgsky Sports Complex on October 31, 2010 in St.Petersburg, Russia. (Photo by Dmitry Korotayev/Epsilon/Getty Images)

Dmitry Korotayev/2010 Getty Images

Little-known Kazakh Mikhail Kukushkin stunned top seed Mikhail Youzhny 6-3 7-6 in the St Petersburg Open final on Sunday to win his maiden title.

Kukushkin, playing in his first ATP final, broke the world number 10 twice to clinch the opening set.

The Russian served for the second set after breaking his opponent's serve in the 11th game but the 88th-ranked Kazakh broke right back to force a tie-breaker.

Story continues below advertisement

Youzhny had saved a match point to win his quarter-final on Friday, then four more in beating compatriot Dmitry Tursunov in Saturday's semi-finals, but he could not find a way past the 22-year-old from Astana.

Kukushkin dominated the tiebreaker 7-2 to seal victory after nearly 2-1/2 hours.

"What can I say, it was an amazing week for me," Russian-born Kukushkin, who moved to Kazakhstan two years ago, told reporters after pocketing the $113,600 -- by far the biggest prize of his career.

"Honestly, when the tournament started I didn't think I would last two rounds here, but I found myself playing in the final.

"Today I served well, played solid from the baseline, and also took my chances. That's the secret of my sucess."

Youzhny, who was aiming for his third title of the year, praised the winner.

"I don't want to look for excuses, the fact that I had to play two tough matches just to get to the final," the 28-year-old Muscovite, who won here in 2004, said.

Story continues below advertisement

"I would rather give credit to my opponent, who played really well today and fully deserved his victory."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies