Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Mixed martial arts fighter Anderson Silva, from Brazil, poses during the UFC 153 weigh-in event in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Friday Oct. 12, 2012.

Felipe Dana/The Associated Press

The cost of seeing MMA icon Anderson Silva swallowed up in a doping scandal is probably incalculable to the UFC.

But the executive director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission says it's to the UFC's credit that the organization paid the freight for the out-of-competition test that caught the former middleweight champion.

"I will tell you that the UFC has aggressively gone after their own fighters that are using performance-enhancing drugs," said Bob Bennett.

Story continues below advertisement

"The UFC has provided the financial means for us to do this out-of-competition testing ... Not only does the UFC pay for us to do it, then they lose some of their top fighters that we catch," he added. "So I think it's a real credit to the UFC that they're trying to level the playing field or level the Octagon."

Silva, who has denied cheating, tested positive for two steroids at a Jan. 9 test in California. Coincidentally Nick Diaz, whom Silva beat in the main event of UFC 183 last Saturday in Las Vegas, tested positive fight night for a third time for marijuana.

Both men have been temporarily suspended pending a hearing.

The Nevada commission, seen as the leader in combat sports commissions, tests fighters out of competition and at events. It follows the World Anti-Doping Commission protocol and has sent representatives as far afield as Argentina to test fighters on the promoter's dime.

Out-of-competition tests are random. "Nobody knows when we're coming, what day, whatever. We don't discuss it with anyone," said Bennett.

Such tests are only for performance-enhancing drugs, including steroids and diuretics. Blood and urine samples are sent to the WADA-accredited Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory in Salt Lake City.

On fight night, samples are also taken. Bennett says most fighters on a card are tested pre- and post-event for performance-enhancing and illicit drugs.

Story continues below advertisement

Who is chosen fight night is random and not everyone is tested due to cost. But most are, said Bennett.

Bennett says the headliners are tested "most of the time" out of competition. He acknowledges it is not all-encompassing but says "at least it levels the playing field and lets the fighters and the promoters know that we have a pretty intensive performance-enhancing drug policy, even though there's always room for improvement."

While Diaz has a medical marijuana card issued in California to treat anxiety, Bennett says that doesn't mean a green light in Nevada. A fighter can ask for a therapeutic use exemption for health issues but that probably wouldn't work given other options to treat anxiety disorders.

That may change down the line, with the drug decriminalized in several states, he added.

Bennett says the Silva camp had asked for the 'B' sample from the out-of-competition test to be checked at another lab. But according to WADA, the 'B' sample can only be checked by the same lab, essentially to preserve chain of custody.

The Silva camp could do that, including having a representative on site to watch.

Story continues below advertisement

Bennett is a retired FBI special agent and U.S. Marine captain who previously served as a pro boxing judge for the Nevada commission.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies