Skip to main content

International Olympic Committee members voted for the long-favoured Milan-Cortina bid over Stockholm-Are from Sweden that also included a bobsled track in Latvia.

FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images

Riding a wave of widespread Italian enthusiasm to be an Olympic host, Milan and Cortina d’Ampezzo won the vote on Monday to stage the 2026 Winter Games.

International Olympic Committee (IOC) members voted 47-34 for the long-favoured Milan-Cortina bid over Stockholm-Are from Sweden that also included a bobsleigh track in Latvia.

Milan-Cortina’s jubilant delegation broke into chants of “Italia! Italia!” when the result was announced, giving the Alpine country a second Winter Games in 20 years.

Story continues below advertisement

“I’m really emotional,” Italian Olympic president Giovanni Malago said, close to tears at the winner’s news conference. “It’s a very important result, not only for me but the whole country.”

Italy will get a third Winter Olympics, after Turin played host to the Games in 2006 and ski resort Cortina staged them in 1956.

Sweden never played host to the Winter Games and suffers an eighth loss in bidding in the past 41 years.

A lack of enthusiasm for the project in Sweden – rating 28 per cent below the Italians in the IOC’s own polls – was a decisive factor.

“What was clear was the gap in public support,” IOC president Thomas Bach said, suggesting it hinted at weaker political backing.

A spirited late campaign effort was in vain, including Stockholm’s Mayor Anna Konig Jerlmyr appealing to voters from the stage by singing a lyric from the ABBA song Dancing Queen.

A sign of simmering Swedish frustration came minutes later when IOC board member Gunilla Lindberg pushed the limit of Olympic diplomacy, ending her team’s 30-minute presentation.

Story continues below advertisement

Lindberg challenged her colleagues to reward a new kind of creative, cost-effective bid the IOC has said it wanted – “Or is it just talk?”

“It just came. I felt it [needed to be said],” Lindberg said after the vote.

Instead, IOC members picked Italy despite the country’s debt-hit economy which faces increasing scrutiny from the European Union.

“We submit with full confidence to your judgment,” Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte told IOC members before their vote.

Both candidates would likely have failed to get this far in previous Olympic bidding contests.

The IOC has relaxed previously strict rules that demanded financial guarantees and government support earlier in the process.

Story continues below advertisement

It was an attempt to revive Winter Games bidding with just two candidates on the ballot paper for a second straight time, since Russia spent US$51-billion on venues and infrastructure for the 2014 Sochi Olympics.

Now, the IOC seeks to avoid costly new venues – and potential white elephants – while encouraging regions and multistate bids to share the load. Hence, Sweden teamed with Latvia, across the Baltic Sea, rather than build its own ice-sliding sports venue.

“We have budget problems in Italy, but I think that this is something that everyone has,” Italian Undersecretary of State Giancarlo Giorgetti said at an earlier news conference, citing the wealth of the Lombardy and Veneto provinces underwriting the cost of the Games. “They are two of the richest provinces in Europe.”

The IOC will give at least US$925-million toward Italy’s Games operating costs of up to US$1.7-billion.

After Russia’s huge spending on venues, infrastructure and cost overruns for the 2014 Sochi Winter Games, multibillion dollar construction projects were awarded in new markets for the 2018 Pyeongchang Olympics and 2022 Beijing Olympics.

The 2026 contest met Bach’s long-stated wish to return to traditional winter sports heartlands, use existing venues and cut costs.

Story continues below advertisement

The IOC praised both candidates for projecting sports budgets “on average 20 per cent lower” than spending on the 2018 and 2022 Games.

Building athlete villages in Milan and Stockholm shaped out as the main capital investment and most uncertain ventures in the projects.

Last week, the IOC flagged Stockholm’s village as a risk, and asked for more details of guarantees underwriting the project.

“A letter of intent is as important to us as any contract,” Volvo chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg said in the formal presentation, in what seemed a rebuke to the Olympic body.

Needing to work hard to persuade Olympic voters, Sweden sent its heir to the throne, Crown Princess Victoria, and Prime Minister Stefan Lofven to Lausanne, Switzerland, where the committee vote was held.

Sweden’s search continues for its first home Olympics since the 1912 Stockholm Summer Games.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies