Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Canada's Brent Hayden kisses his starting block following his third place finish in the men's 100-meter freestyle swimming final at the Aquatics Centre in the Olympic Park during the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. (Matt Slocum/AP)
Canada's Brent Hayden kisses his starting block following his third place finish in the men's 100-meter freestyle swimming final at the Aquatics Centre in the Olympic Park during the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. (Matt Slocum/AP)

London 2012

Encouraging signs for Canada’s Olympic future Add to ...

Excluding the seven gold medals won in Barcelona, Canada has a tradition of winning three golds per Games, dating to Seoul in 1988. The COC’s expected count for London was 20 medals, good enough for a top-12 finish.

Strong goals, and difficult to achieve.

“They were strong goals, difficult goals to achieve, and we still have a chance to do it. It’s the only mark we want to achieve,” Aubut said.

To get there, OTP spent an average of $30-million over the past three years. By comparison, Canadian winter sports got $24-million the year before the Vancouver Olympics. That money went further given the fewer athletes who competed in Vancouver (206) as compared to London (277).

Some summer sports got a boatload of money based on medal potential. Rowing Canada received $7-million and was the benefactor of OTP’s Innovations For Gold, a secret projects division aimed at supplying technology advancements, none of which have been revealed. The rowers were supposed to match the four medals won in Beijing.

The men’s and women’s eights each delivered a silverbut Lindsay Jennerich and Patricia Obee failed to make the finals while defending silver medalists David Calder and Scott Frandsen finished last in the pairs’ finals.

“Our indications from the pre-Olympic training camp were really good,” said Rowing Canada’s high performance director Peter Cookson. “We thought we could get to five, six finals and they didn’t pan out. There are a whole bunch of various factors I need to really look at a lot closer. I don’t know all the reasons yet.”

Rowing Canada will conduct a post-Olympic review and may revise its coaching staff as it moves ahead to 2016. It won’t be the only association to do so.

Diving had designs on an individual medal to go along with their women’s synchro teams, which were projected to finish on the podium. Swimming had hoped for three medals and 15 finals and instead ended up with two medals and eight finalists.

Track cycling was expecting two individual medals and got neither.

As Swimming Canada CEO Pierre Lafontaine explained it, some of that is due to the how the Olympics continue to evolve, with more countries sending more athletes to more events adding to the competitive depth.

“Swimming is now like a lot of other events at the Olympics. Athletes are coming from everywhere,” he said. “And they’re good.”

If you squint at the big picture for Canada, you’ll see some encouraging indications. A perusal of the pre-Games rankings by Infostrada, a firm that specializes in statistical sports projections, shows a healthy majority of the Canadian athletes rated among the top eight in their event either met or exceeded expectations.

Of the 13 athletes who have finished their events that Infostrada had ranked in medal positions (there are several more competing this weekend), only five entries fell short of the podium – taekwondo competitor Karine Sergerie, shot putter Dylan Armstrong, track cyclists Tara Whitten and Zach Bell and rowers Jennerich and Obee.

Anne Merklinger, the chief executive officer at OTP, said “our investments have paid off”.

The key to improving, she said, is to continue the emphasis on improving high-performance coaching and on acquiring technology – the so-called Top Secret program had a $2.2-million budget for the 2010 Vancouver Games, and just a million for both summer and winter sports last year.

“Research and innovation is an area where Canada’s just scratching the surface. You’re not in that, you’re not in the game,” she said.

At the same time, Merklinger said that in OTP’s ‘category one’ sports – which have high medal potential – the athletes did the business.

“We got four sports that won two or more medals and the other one won one, so that’s exceptional … there’s still opportunity to work with people in the top categories, there’s still several medals on the table,” she said.

Merklinger also said that the effect of inspirational performances like that of the women’s soccer squad will help address the main weakness of the Olympic program – a relatively shallow pool of young elite athletes.

“People love [the soccer team]. They watched it. They cared. And they’re from so many different communities. They’re role models for so many girls and women,” she said.

The hope within OTP and the COC is that events like the 2015 Pan-Am Games will be a fertile proving ground for generation next, and that infrastructure like a new velodrome near Toronto can allow Canada to emulate Great Britain’s talent pipeline.

And never let it be said Team Canada lacks ambition.

Aubut said the goal for Rio de Janeiro could well be to break into the top-10 medal-winning countries.

If the new faces end up adorned in bronze that may be as good as it gets. In the Games of the Summer Olympiad you can always do worse.

Report Typo/Error
Single page

Follow us on Twitter: @MrSeanGordon, @AllanMaki


Next story