Skip to main content

In this file photo, people smoke a joint during a demonstration to claim for the legalization of the use of marijuana.

Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images/Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images

Follow The Globe's SOCHI LIVE for the latest from the Winter Olympics

Olympic officials take great pride in cracking down on doping and so far no athlete has tested positive at the Sochi Olympics. But officials acknowledge they have had a difficult time dealing with one drug in particular: marijuana.

Technically, marijuana is on the World Anti-Doping Agency list of banned drugs, which governs events like the Olympics, because officials consider it to be performance enhancing and a violation of the "spirit of sport." But in a nod to the growing relaxed attitude toward the drug around the world, the cut-off level for a positive test has been increased for the Sochi Games, allowing for some recreational use prior to the Olympics.

Story continues below advertisement

The new threshold for the active ingredient in marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol or THC, has been increased from 15 nanograms per millilitre of urine to 150ng/mls. Officials say that means an athlete who smoked some weed before the Olympics, or inhaled second-hand smoke, wouldn't likely test positive in Sochi. Someone who failed the new test would have to be "a pretty dedicated cannabis consumer," WADA officials have said.

Officials acknowledge that they have had problems finding the right balance between athletes who use marijuana to cheat and those who just enjoy a toke every now and then.

Arne Ljungqvist, who heads the IOC's medical commission and is also on WADA's board, said the changes came after a long debate about the drug. "That's a reasonable attempt at dealing with a complicated matter and that was agreed upon as the best way to proceed with this particular issue," he told reporters Saturday in Sochi. "There is a big debate on it."

In the end, he said WADA came to the conclusion that "marijuana can be a performance enhancing stimulant and it is therefore forbidden in relation to a competition." However, because marijuana "is a socially more or less an accepted drug being used in social context" the threshold for a positive test during competition was increased.

Marijuana has been controversial for years at WADA and there have been plenty of calls to drop it from the banned list. Canada's Ross Rebagliati famously tested positive for weed at the 1998 Olympics and nearly lost his gold medal in the snowboard giant slalom. Rebagliati, who had 17.8 ng/ml. of THC in his urine, claimed he had inhaled second-hand smoke and he was eventually allowed to keep his medal. There have been several positive tests since then including at the London Games in 2012 where an American judo athlete was expelled.

Opinions on whether weed helps or hinders performance vary. Just about everyone agrees that taking marijuana immediately before a competition wouldn't help, but some argue that dope can reduce stress, speed recovery and provide other advantages. WADA also uses three criteria for including drugs on its banned list; performance enhancement, danger to health and a violation of the spirit of sport. Marijuana generally falls under the last criteria, which is a nebulous concept that includes ethics, honesty and "respect for self and other participants."

While the rules on marijuana have been loosened, the IOC and WADA have toughened some other measures. WADA has increased the penalty for serious drug users to a four-year ban from competing, up from two-years. And the IOC plans to hang on to all samples for ten years, up from eight years. That means samples can be re-tested, and athletes sanctioned, as new detection procedures are developed.

Story continues below advertisement

Ljungqvist said there are challenges keeping samples that long, such as finding storage space and making sure the samples remain in good condition. But he said the longer time frame sends a message to athletes that if they cheat and get away with it during the Olympics, they can still be caught many years later.

Ljungqvist declined to speculate on whether the lack of positive tests at Sochi meant that the testing had improved or the cheaters had gotten smarter. He noted that there was only one positive test at the Vancouver Olympics but there were seven at the Games in Turin and Salt Lake City.

This "could be a picture of increased smartness from our side and that people are aware of that," he said. "I put my money on our scientists."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies