Skip to main content

Soccer UEFA opens formal investigation into whether Manchester City violated financial monitoring rules

UEFA has opened a formal investigation into whether Manchester City has violated financial-monitoring rules, after confidential club documents were published in the Football Leaks series.

In the most serious cases of breaking “Financial Fair Play” rules designed to control excessive spending on player transfers and wages, UEFA can ban clubs from the Champions League.

UEFA said Thursday its independent club finance panel is focusing on “several alleged violations of FFP that were recently made public in various media outlets.”

Story continues below advertisement

Internal documents about Man City’s business and emails between club executives have been published in the Football Leaks series led by Der Spiegel magazine.

The revelations suggest Man City officials deceived UEFA over several years, including by disguising the source of revenue from sponsorship deals tied to the club’s owners in Abu Dhabi.

In one batch of communications between Man City officials, the club seemed ready to threaten to destroy UEFA with legal action before reaching a 2014 settlement agreement to close an investigation.

Then, Man City forfeited €20-million (around $30.1-million) in Champions League prize money but continued to play in world soccer’s most prestigious club competition.

Man City has repeatedly declined to address specific allegations, and have not contested the authenticity of the documents.

“The attempt to damage the club’s reputation is organized and clear,” the club has said since November.

The Pep Guardiola-coached team is currently top of England’s Premier League, seeking its fourth league title in the past eight seasons. The team hosts Schalke next week in the Champions League, holding a 3-2 lead from the first leg.

Story continues below advertisement

Since July, 2011, UEFA has monitored the accounts of all clubs which qualify to play in the Champions League and Europa League.

Launched as the flagship policy of UEFA’s then-president Michel Platini, it was designed to force clubs to break even on their soccer-related income and spending to prevent clubs from becoming unsustainable. It also sought to control wealthy owners distorting the market in transfers and wages by driving up costs.

Critics of FFP say it protects historically successful clubs with global brands from being challenged by ambitious newcomers.

The biggest forfeits were paid in 2014 by Man City and Paris Saint-Germain, which were bought using sovereign wealth respectively by Abu Dhabi’s ruling family in 2008 and Qatar’s in 2011.

UEFA gave no timetable for the case, stating it “will make no further comments on the matter while the investigation is ongoing.”

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter