Skip to main content

A worker puts down turf at Olympic Stadium in Montreal in preparation for the FIFA U-20 World Cup soccer tournament, June 28, 2007. The 2015 Women’s World Cup will also be played on turf, which has upset some players.

SHAUN BEST/REUTERS

Soccer's international governing body says it rejected informal offers it received to lay down real grass for the Women's World Cup in part because the proposals didn't include the practice fields.

In a statement Monday, FIFA maintains that the artificial turf that will be used for the upcoming event in Canada meets its highest standards. Regulations stipulate that teams play and train on a consistent surface.

The artificial turf fields that will be used in the World Cup have been a contentious issue with some of the players, who say forcing the women to play on fake grass amounts to gender discrimination because their male counterparts play soccer's premier tournament on natural grass.

Story continues below advertisement

Players – both male and female – have long claimed that artificial surfaces are less forgiving than natural grass and impact play because of concerns about injury. They also say balls travel and bounce differently on turf.

U.S. forward Abby Wambach has been a vocal critic of FIFA's decision, and last fall led a group of players who took legal action in Canada in protest of the artificial surface. The claim was dropped earlier this year when the players decided it was best to focus on preparing for the World Cup, which starts on June 6. The month-long event will be played on artificial turf fields in six Canadian cities.

Wambach said last week that there were offers to lay down grass for the tournament for free, prompting FIFA's response.

The governing body, based in Zurich, maintained that Canada's bid for the event included the artificial turf, which FIFA accepted on the condition it met competition standards.

"The contact [with the natural grass companies] was informal and didn't include any range of price for any service," FIFA said in the statement Monday. "The proposals were for the official stadia only and not for the various training sites [18 in total] to allow the players to train on a consistent surface throughout the tournament."

Wambach emphasized that while it's productive to shine a light on the issue so that future World Cups are played on grass, it is important that attention now be focused on the tournament.

FIFA changed its rules in 2004 to allow sanctioned matches on certain artificial surfaces. A few games at the 2010 men's World Cup in South Africa were played on grass that had been reinforced by artificial fibers.

Story continues below advertisement

FIFA rules also state that all matches and practices for the World Cup must be held on the same surface. Canada's bid for the event stipulated that the final be played on an artificial field at BC Place in Vancouver.

A group of some 60 players – including Wambach, U.S. teammate Alex Morgan and Germany's Nadine Angerer – filed a complaint last fall with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. It named FIFA, the international governing body for soccer, and the Canadian Soccer Association. Neither budged in reconsidering the planned surface for the event.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.