Skip to main content

Simona Halep of Romania reaches out for the ball against Ashleigh Barty of Australia during day six of the Rogers Cup at IGA Stadium on August 11, 2018 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Minas Panagiotakis/Getty Images

Simona Halep’s scheduling dispute with tournament organizers looked to have no effect on her play on the court.

The top-seed and the world’s top-ranked player cruised past Ashleigh Barty 6-4, 6-1 on Saturday in a women’s Rogers Cup semifinal. She advanced to Sunday’s final against the winner of an evening match between third-seeded Sloane Stephens and fifth-seeded Elina Svitolina.

The night before, Halep blasted the Women’s Tennis Association for giving her difficult match times, saying she got the worst schedule in the 56-player event and that “this happens almost every tournament.”

Story continues below advertisement

But playing on only 15 hours rest, Halep was in control from the outset against 15th seeded Barty, eliminating the 22-year-old Australian in one hour 11 minutes.

“I was very sore when I woke up,” said Halep. “During the match, it’s not easy to run so much but, you know, I just tried to focus on what I have to play and, to make it a little bit easier, which I did in the end, was to finish it early.”

She had nothing to add to her scheduling dispute, which saw her play four matches in three days after a night session was postponed due to rain.

“I think I talked enough about it,” she said. “I hope in the future it’s going to be better. I was upset. I am upset. But doesn’t change my performance on court.”

Halep has reached the Rogers Cup final for the third time in four years. She won the last time it was held in Montreal in 2016.

The Romanian showed her class as she broke Barty’s serve in the opening game with an impressive series of forehands down the lines. She broke again for a 4-1 lead, but the Australian then had her best moments, breaking back after a cross-court shot that drew a roar from the IGA Stadium crowd.

But Halep did not lose a point on her serve the rest of the set, and broke twice more to open the second set. She completed the victory in one hour 11 minutes.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think I played smart tennis today,” she said. “I pushed her very back on her backhand, then I could just receive a shorter ball, an easier ball for me to open the court.

“Then I just went all the way on her forehand — short, cross, long, everything. I played some slices.”

Halep is 6-2 against Stephens in her career, including a win in this year’s French Open final, and has won their last five meetings.

Svitolina leads 4-2 against Halep, winning the last three including a semifinal meeting at last year’s Rogers Cup in Toronto.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.