Skip to main content

iPhone 4

Spencer Platt/2010 Getty Images

Consumer Reports won't recommend the iPhone 4 to customers due to reception issues caused by touching the left side of the phone, the magazine said today.

"When your finger or hand touches a spot on the phone's lower left side-an easy thing, especially for lefties-the signal can significantly degrade enough to cause you to lose your connection altogether if you're in an area with a weak signal. Due to this problem, we can't recommend the iPhone 4."

The magazine tested the phone in a controlled environment, and compared the iPhone 4 to the iPhone 3G S as well as similar devices on the AT&T network.

Story continues below advertisement

In response to related complaints from customers, Apple released a statement on July 2 claiming the problem was not one of reception, but of faulty software which "mistakenly displays two more bars than it should for a given signal strength."

Consumer Reports recommended that users cover the antenna gap on the bottom-left corner of the phone with a piece of tape, or use a case, as a temporary fix to signal problems.

Although the iPhone 4 was not a "recommended" item on the Consumer Reports website, it did receive high scores for a sharp display and the best video camera they had seen on a phone, and ranked at the top Consumer Report's latest ratings of smart phones.

Apple needed to come up with a permanent and free fix to the reception problem before the magazine would recommend the product, accordig to the magazine.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies