Skip to main content

Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Adam Guerbuez has a pending Facebook request … for $873-million.

The Canadian, whose garish ads for erectile dysfunction cures landed in the inboxes and "walls" of millions of Facebook users, must pay the massive amount to the social networking site, a court has ruled. Junk mail and spam accounts on Facebook are a rising irritant to users, as the site continues to grow, so the company is eager to make an example of Mr. Guerbuez.

For each spam message, a California court fined Mr. Guerbuez $100, in addition to another $100 in damages. The total came to about $873-million (U.S.). Mr. Guerbuez appealed the ruling in Quebec. Now, a Quebec court has upheld the decision, leaving Mr. Guerbuez on the hook for a fine so large it has landed him in the Guinness book of world records - a fine he will almost certainly never pay.

Story continues below advertisement

"My client has already filed under the bankruptcy act, so [Facebook becomes]one of his creditors," said Mr. Guerbuez's Canadian lawyer, Éric Potvin.

"Facebook becomes the biggest one of his creditors," he added.

The original California court ruling, which came down in late 2008 against Mr. Guerbuez and his company, Atlantis Blue Capital, was the largest in history under U.S. anti-spam legislation.

Mr. Potvin said his client decided to file an appeal of the California ruling in Quebec because the amount of the fine was so disproportionate, and because a Quebec court might have provided Mr. Guerbuez with some reprieve in his home province.

"We argued that no such judgment could have been rendered in a Quebec court because it would be against public order," he said, adding that the total fine doesn't reflect the amount of monetary damages Facebook suffered.

Even at the time of the original ruling, Facebook considered the odds of collecting the money slim.

"Does Facebook expect to quickly collect $873-million and share the proceeds in some way with our users? Alas, no. It's unlikely that Guerbuez and Atlantis Blue Capital could ever honour the judgment rendered against them (though we will certainly collect everything we can)," the company wrote on its blog after the original verdict. "But we are confident that this award represents a powerful deterrent to anyone and everyone who would seek to abuse Facebook and its users."

Story continues below advertisement

A year later, Facebook won a similar victory for $711-million (U.S.) against another spammer. As the social networking site grows past the 500-million-user mark, the number of fake spam accounts is also growing. Facebook hopes such rulings, which can sometimes mean jail time for repeat offenders, will deter other spammers.

Facebook alleged Mr. Guerbuez conned users into giving up their usernames and passwords. Once he had that information, the website alleged, he used those accounts to send out millions of unsolicited advertising messages via Facebook.

Mr. Guerbuez has milked his two-year saga for all the publicity it's worth. He has set up a blog, and has claimed repeatedly that authors have asked him about the possibility of turning the experience into a book. He repeatedly refers to himself on his Internet postings as the "873 million dollar man," and posts photos from various vacations and trips to high-end restaurants. He plans to hold a press conference Wednesday to discuss the court ruling. Indeed, the only concrete punishment Mr. Guerbuez appears to have suffered, beyond filing for bankruptcy this summer, is a ban prohibiting him from using Facebook.

Although Facebook has said it will try to collect as much of the money as possible, it is likely Mr. Guerbuez could escape paying the social network site anything once he is released from bankruptcy.

"After that, life goes on," Mr. Potvin said. "It's treated as any other debt."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.