Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Alan Billis agreed to become a modern-day mummy, donating his body to test a new idea on how the Egyptians preserved their dead.

Callum Bulmer

Jan Billis didn't mind her husband being mummified, but she drew the line at viewing him once the wrapping was ready to be removed.

It was the first time they'd been together since he died. Alan, her spouse of 36 years, had agreed to become a modern-day mummy, donating his body to test a new idea on how the Egyptians preserved their dead.

He had been through a months-long process of cleaning, disembowelling, drying and wrapping, and she entered the room to find his swaddled body on a gurney.

Story continues below advertisement

"It wasn't frightening, it wasn't horrible, it wasn't upsetting," she said in a recent telephone interview from Devon, England. But her composure would go only so far. "I wasn't quite sure I'd be all right if I saw him unwrapped, so I didn't."

The unusual project – the subject of a not-for-the-squeamish documentary called I Was Mummified airing Sunday on the Discovery Channel – hoped to validate a theory on mummification.

Stephen Buckley, a research fellow in the department of archaelogy at the University of York, believed that the ancient Egyptians dried the body by immersing it in a briny solution. The general theory, including at stalwarts of Egyptology such as the British Museum, is that bodies to be mummified were dried through the direct application of a dessicant called natron.

Dr. Buckley said in an e-mail exchange from Egypt that his theory stems from a Valley of the Kings project nearly a decade ago in which x-rays on mummies turned up unexplained white structures dubbed "snowflakes."

He looked at all available x-rays for mummies and found that these appeared in specimens from the 18th dynasty, when the preservation process was at its most sophisticated.

After scanning scientific reports from nearly a century ago, he concluded the "snowflakes" were natron, and theorized that it would take a bath of the substance for it to penetrate so deeply into the body.

Tests with pig parts and piglets were undertaken but it would take a human subject truly to judge the theory's validity.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Billis said her husband was not particularly interested in Egyptology and didn't care what would happen to him after death, telling her to "dig a hole up the garden and bury me in a box."

But one day, his terminal lung cancer well advanced, he saw an newspaper advertisement seeking a mummy subject. He was intrigued and called to learn more.

"It's an experiment," Mr. Billis said in a press cut of the documentary. "Perhaps it won't serve any purpose to save a life or anything, but people can still learn from it. That's what we all strive for, to learn."

The documentary takes the viewer through a three-month process. Mr. Billis died in January of 2011 and most of his organs were removed through a slit in the abdomen.

The cavity was packed with linen bags, restoring his body's shape, before he was sewn up. His body was coated with sesame oil, beeswax and resin and then allowed to dry before being immersed in the powerful natron solution for 35 days.

After being removed from the briny bath, he was placed in a heated room with low humidity. The process dried his body out for two weeks, turning his face a greenish-grey hue, by the time he was ready to wrap.

Story continues below advertisement

It was a painstaking process, with each limb wrapped individually before the whole body was shrouded. And then he rested for another six weeks.

According to the documentary, it worked. CT scans showed that the body was stable in even its deepest tissue and that there was a "pretty uniform mummification." Dr. Buckley said that they would continue to study the body, which should go on losing water and increasingly resemble the sort of ancient mummy seen in museums.

"It would have been arrogant of us to have expected to get everything right when the Egyptian embalmers took centuries to perfect their 'art'," Dr. Buckley said by e-mail. "That we learnt [sic] some of the important nuances... only served to make us appreciate their skills all the more."

In England, the mummy's widow remains a bit bemused by the whole situation. She said that her husband never really explained why he wanted to do it, but she wasn't surprised, given his desire to be the centre of attention.

She said she has been to see her husband a few times and that his grandchildren are particularly pleased with his decision. One day she went into the bathroom to see them playing and a toddler wrapped in towels. One of the other children explained, "Granddad is on the floor in the bathroom."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies