Skip to main content
the future is smart

Professor Steve Mann demonstrate his "Phenomenamplifier" invention in Toronto, Monday May 4, 2015. The "Phenomenamplifier" amplifies physical phenomena to drive light sources that makes invisible signals, visible. During this 30 second exposure on the camera surveilluminescence is see, where the lamp glows when it is seen by a surveillance camera, thus indicating the amount of surveillance present at each point in 3D space.

This article is part of a series called The Future is Smart: How the Internet of Things is changing business

Follow the series at

      Decades before the likes of the Fitbit and Apple Watch adorned the wrists of tech-savvy trendsetters, Hamilton, Ont.-born Steve Mann strapped a computer to his head and started to experiment with wearable computing.

      The man – once dubbed by the media as “the world’s first cyborg” – attracted more than a few naysayers in the seventies, when he began trudging around with loads of gear and a set of ungainly rabbit ears cropping out of his skull.

      Known as “the father of wearable computing,” the computer engineering professor at the University of Toronto has spent more than three decades with one eye in the real world, and the other focused on augmediated reality – a term he uses to describe a deliberate modification to a person’s perception of the world. It’s one phrase in a vast lexicon of terms he’s coined to describe his work with wearables.

      “People used to really think of this technology as ‘other,’ but I think we’re kind of crossing over the other side,” Mr. Mann, 53, said in a recent interview at his lab, surrounded by his gadgets spanning musical instruments to fitness gear.

      While Mr. Mann has been working to miniaturize his wearables over the years – and had ditched the rabbit ears and much of the bulk by the time he reached the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as a grad student in the nineties – more and more devices have been coming online every year. He and his colleagues at MIT once referred to this ever-increasing number of network-enabled devices as “things that think.” Today, it’s better known as the “Internet of Things.” And while IoT technology offers to streamline and automate a multitude of everyday activities, it also guarantees to collect an inordinate amount of data and make the world a lot less private.

      Some notable Steve Mann projects

      EyeTap Digital Eye Glass

      Currently in its fourth generation, which Mr. Mann created in 1999, the eye wear looks a lot like Google Glass, the technology the web giant prototyped and offered in limited numbers from 2013 to early 2015. Mr. Mann created the first-generation EyeTap in 1978.

      Using a beam splitter to divert light that would otherwise have entered the eye, a computer is able to process the image, superimpose other information or alter the image before redirecting it into the eye. Although Mr. Mann wears the device most of the time, no commercial version is available yet.

      Mr. Mann made headlines in the summer of 2012 when he said McDonald’s employees in Paris assaulted him as they tried to remove his Eyetap device while he was dining with his family.

      Meta Company

      Mr. Mann is the chief scientist at Meta, a California-based firm that produces augmented reality products. The company raised $23-million (U.S.) in a round funding earlier this year.

      Touting its products as something more than Google Glass, which Meta CEO Meron Gribetz called a “phone accessory,” the company creates eye wear capable of producing holograms with which users can interact.

      The Meta 1, the company’s latest product, is available to software and hardware developers.

      Mannfit System

      Mr. Mann is developing a fitness system based on integral kinematics. He thinks doing exercises such as dips, leg raises or pull-ups with a bar that generally stays in a fixed position is too simple, and has designed a destabilization bar and cellphone app to make working out more difficult and more rewarding.

      While the exercisers try to maintain their balance, an affixed cellphone measures their success.

      “The Internet of Things is a giant data vacuum cleaner,” said Adam Thierer, a senior research fellow who specializes in technology policy at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center in Virginia.

      “Basically these technologies, and especially wearables, will be collecting all of our daily footprints. Some of the most intimate details of our lives will now be tracked in real time – right down to things that even maybe happen in your bedroom,” he added.

      While no one doubts the privacy concerns, experts are at odds over how the IoT and wearables fit together.

      Mr. Mann considers each an entirely separate technology. IoT devices are surveillance technology, he says, while wearables are “sousveillant” technology, or devices that record activities from the perspective of the participant. The scientist coined this term as well, deriving it from the French word “sous,” meaning “below,” as opposed to “sur,” meaning “on.”

      For Mr. Mann, wearables work to offset the privacy concerns surrounding the IoT by offering everyday people the chance to collect the same data accumulated by IoT technology.

      “Some people say surveillance is good, other people say surveillance is bad, I say you’re both wrong,” Mr. Mann said, wearing the EyeTap digital eyeglass device he invented long before anyone had heard of Google Glass. “Surveillance is only a half-truth. Without sousveillance, it’s out of balance.”

      Most people collecting personal data outside science labs like Mr. Mann’s, however, do so through popular devices like smartwatches or fitness trackers sold by tech giants that store their customers’ data on their own networks. What they do with that data and how closely it’s guarded from potential hackers is where privacy concerns arise.

      “I think there are real dangers there,” Mr. Thierer said. “Because at some point the question becomes who has access to that data, what is that data correlated with and what decisions will be made based on that data.”

      Mr. Thierer thinks, for example, insurance companies could begin adjusting premiums for health or car insurance as a result of the data wearables collect. How advertisers, employers and governments may use the data are other areas of concern.

      From his lab, Mr. Mann is quick to point out that wearables don’t have to be Internet-dependent. He thinks “Internet” is simply too limiting a word, and that wearables eventually will be able to run on a broad range of networks, not just today’s dominant one.

      Though not connected to large corporate cloud networks, Mr. Mann’s wearable computers are capable of connecting to wireless networks – Internet or otherwise – if they’re attached to a WiFi device. In fact, he performed the world’s first wireless livestream in the early nineties using a hand-built communication system.

      While most of his inventions are not available for purchase, he’s hopeful that his work – and that of his students – will offer alternatives to today’s increasingly popular wearable devices and mitigate some of the growing privacy concerns surrounding the IoT.

      “Many people regard Toronto as the birthplace of wearable computing,” Mr. Mann said. “So Canada has kind of become the epicentre of that sort of thing, and still is in many ways.”