Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A customer tries out wireless internet access.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Canada's telecom regulator is considering whether to force big companies such as BCE Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc. to open their books and face more scrutiny about the costs they charge independent Internet service providers to lease space on their networks.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission announced Thursday that it is holding a consultation to determine if confidential information submitted by incumbents to establish wholesale service rates should be put on the public record.

Moreover, the CRTC is signalling that it could become more rigorous about what it admits as secret information down the road. That means incumbents could face tougher questions about whether their costing information is actually commercially sensitive.

Story continues below advertisement

Independent Internet service providers, such as TekSavvy Solutions Inc., have long demanded more transparency around incumbents' costs and markups, arguing the prices they pay are artificially high and limit competition in the market.

That's because the wholesale rates paid by smaller firms influence consumer prices. In that regard, some smaller ISPs have started hiking residential rates in the wake of the CRTC's recent compromise decision on usage-based billing (UBB).

In announcing its new consultation, the CRTC said it is in "the public interest to obtain as full and complete a record as possible" on which to base its decisions on wholesale rates – a stance that is bound to be welcomed by consumers given the public outcry over UBB in recent years.

"Accordingly, the commission is initiating this proceeding to consider if additional cost study elements and markups should be expected to be disclosed," the CRTC said in its notice.

"The Commission notes that this proceeding does not preclude future consideration of other potential approaches to parties' access to incumbent carrier costing information."

The CRTC said it expects to publish a decision on its consultation by late October. Incumbents including BCE and Shaw Communications Inc. declined comment. Rogers, though, confirmed it would participate in the consultation and would submit its comments in due course.

For their part, independent ISPs immediately cheered the CRTC's consultation, saying they currently have no way to verify whether the wholesale costs they pay are reasonable. They also question why those prices vary so widely from incumbent to incumbent.

Story continues below advertisement

"We did not have the benefit of any transparency in the UBB decisions of last year and we know what that led to," said TekSavvy spokesman George Burger. "And we think that it is in everybody's interest to have a clear understanding of what forms the basis of the decisions of the CRTC in setting prices for wholesale services."

Bill Sandiford, president of the Canadian Network Operators Consortium, a group that represents smaller ISPs, echoed that view: "We believe that transparency in the process is in the best interests of Canadians and consumers as a whole because it will lead to proper pricing of wholesale services."

He added: "Independent ISPs do not expect to ride on the incumbents' networks for free. They are more than willing to pay their just and reasonable costs for the facilities that they use."

The CRTC had issued a new pricing model in November that would see smaller ISPs, which lease space on the networks of larger providers like Bell Canada, pay for the total capacity they need rather than the volume of data downloaded.

That compromise decision, however, is now being appealed by CNOC and companies including BCE, Rogers and Quebecor Media Inc.

A CRTC spokesman confirmed Thursday that the consultation is separate from that appeals' process. As a result, if the consultation results in changes to the disclosure of confidential costing information, those new rules would not apply to the current appeals process.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies