Skip to main content

Harvey Weinstein departs a Manhattan courthouse during his rape trial in New York, Feb. 5, 2020.

John Minchillo/The Associated Press

Attorneys for The Weinstein Co. presented a Delaware judge Wednesday with a revised bankruptcy plan that would provide about $35 million for creditors, including victims of sexual misconduct by disgraced film mogul Harvey Weinstein.

The settlement amount is $11.5 million less than under a previous plan, which was scrapped after a federal judge in New York refused to approve a proposed $19 million settlement between Weinstein and some of his accusers. The settlement in the purported class-action lawsuit was a key component of the initial bankruptcy plan.

Attorneys for the company told Judge Mary Walrath the reduction is due primarily to the fact that the plan no longer includes contributions from insurers for the resolution of certain “Miramax era” claims that arose prior to Harvey Weinstein leaving that company and forming the Weinstein Co.

Story continues below advertisement

Roughly half of the overall settlement amount, about $17 million, is allocated for a single sexual misconduct claims fund, down from about $25.7 million allocated for three separate categories of sexual misconduct claims under the previous plan. Another $8.4 million of the settlement amount would go to a liquidation trust for resolving non-sexual misconduct claims, and $9.7 million would be used to reimburse defence costs for company officials other than Weinstein.

Attorneys for the company made clear that they will not ask Judge Walrath to approve the plan if holders of sexual misconduct claims vote to reject it.

“We will not seek to cram down the plan on the survivors,” said attorney Paul Zumbro.

Meanwhile, attorneys for The Weinstein Co. asked Walrath to approve an Oct. 15 deadline for sexual misconduct claims to be filed, and a process for notifying potential claimants through online posting and publications including The Hollywood Reporter, Variety and The New York Post.

Walrath said that if attorneys can agree on language clarifying the consequences on future litigation for victims who file claims in the bankruptcy, she would allow the company to send out the notices.

“I agree with the debtor that this should go forward and this could resolve, if not all of the claims, a large percentage of those,” she said.

Zumbro said the revised plan will provide greater relief for holders of sexual misconduct claims because the proposed class of claims is smaller than under the original plan, and no money would be going to class-action counsel fees.

Story continues below advertisement

He also noted that Harvey Weinstein would no longer be reimbursed for any of his defence costs or receive any other distribution under the revised plan.

Zumbro noted that the New York judge had described the potential payments to Weinstein as “obnoxious.”

“The debtors and the other settling parties heard that loud and clear,” he said.

Under the new Chapter 11 liquidation proposal, holders of sexual misconduct claims would receive 100% of the liquidated value of their claims if they agree to release Weinstein from all legal claims. A claimant who elects not to release Weinstein but to retain the option to sue him in another court would receive 25% of the value of her bankruptcy claim. The other 75% would be allocated to a “reversionary fund” for the benefit of insurance companies, who could be on the hook for damage payments in future litigation.

In a departure from normal bankruptcy procedure, holders of sexual misconduct claims would not be asked to vote on the plan until each knows the value of her claim.

Robert Feinstein, an attorney for the company’s official committee of unsecured creditors, said the committee unanimously supports the proposed settlement, as do many other individual claimants.

Story continues below advertisement

“We hope it’s received with an open mind, … and that people will hold their fire in the press and in the courtroom until all of the facts are known to them and we can have a mature conversation about what’s going on here,” Feinstein said, referring to attorneys for three non-settling plaintiffs in the New York case. Those attorneys have described the latest proposal as “a complete and utter sellout” of Weinstein’s victims.

Attorneys acting on behalf of two of those women previously asked Walrath to convert the Chapter 11 case to a Chapter 7 liquidation. Doing so would reduce the amount of money going to professionals and allow a trustee to pursue civil claims on behalf of the bankruptcy estate against Weinstein and other company officials, they argue.

But Elizabeth Fegan, an attorney who represents several women in the New York case, including lead plaintiff Louisette Geiss, told Walrath on Wednesday that nearly two dozen women support the revised bankruptcy plan.

“I do think that it’s important that their voices are not outweighed by two women alone who do not approve of the plan,” she said.

The Weinstein Co. sought bankruptcy protection in March 2018 amid a sexual misconduct scandal that brought down Weinstein and triggered a nationwide movement to address predatory sexual behaviour and harassment in the workplace. Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in prison earlier this year after being convicted in New York of rape and sexual assault.

Prosecutors in Los Angeles are seeking his extradition to California to face charges of raping a woman and sexually assaulting another in 2013.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies