Skip to main content
// //

Legislators attend a session at the Chamber of Deputies in La Paz, Bolivia, Nov. 20, 2019.

Natacha Pisarenko/The Associated Press

Bolivia’s interim government presented a bill on Wednesday that aims to forge a path to new elections and defuse street violence that has killed 32 people since a disputed October vote.

The South American country’s two chambers of congress are expected to debate the election bill beginning on Thursday and possibly extending into Friday, which would annul the Oct. 20 poll and appoint a new electoral board within 15 days of its passage, paving the way for a new vote after long-term leftist leader Evo Morales resigned under pressure this month.

A date for new elections was not included in the proposal. The bill called for a “credible and professional” election body “in order to pacify the country and redirect democratic institutionality.”

Story continues below advertisement

Currently led by a caretaker government, Bolivia is grappling to mend stark divisions between Mr. Morales’s supporters and opponents seeking to move beyond his nearly 14-year rule.

He stepped down on Nov. 10 under pressure from protesters, civil groups, security forces and allies, as well as an international audit that found serious irregularities in the election count and cast doubt on his announced outright victory.

Since then, an interim government under former conservative senator Jeanine Anez has struggled to quell deadly violence, and fanned some divisions with abrupt shifts in policy away from Mr. Morales, the country’s first Indigenous president.

In a statement earlier Wednesday, Ms. Anez said she would present the bill calling for new elections “as the whole country is demanding” and that it would be through legal, constitutional channels unless lawmakers blocked it.

“We have developed a basic bill. It can probably be corrected, agreed upon, enriched by all the sectors that are involved with the aim of pacifying the country and choosing our rulers,” she said. “But there will be elections in the country; we guarantee it.”

Conflict in the region of Cochabamba and the high-altitude city of El Alto has rattled Bolivia during the past week since Mr. Morales’s departure, with clashes at a gas power plant blockade on Tuesday that left eight people dead.

That took the total number of deaths in the postelection unrest to 32, according to Bolivia’s official human-rights ombudsman – most of those in the past 10 days – sparking calls for investigations into human-rights abuses.

Story continues below advertisement

On Wednesday, hundreds of people queued to refill gas canisters in La Paz, while lines of cars snaked though the city’s roads waiting to refuel after protests by Morales supporters choked off fuel and food supplies in recent days.

In a news conference on Wednesday, Interior Minister Arturo Murillo claimed Mr. Morales was continuing to stoke unrest. He showed reporters a video of a phone call including audio allegedly of Mr. Morales directing plans for blockades.

Reuters was not able to verify the contents of the video.

“That is Evo Morales doing state terrorism,” Mr. Murillo said, without naming the source of the three-minute video. “In the next few hours we will file an international lawsuit on this.”

Mr. Morales, at a news conference in Mexico, where he was granted political asylum when he fled Bolivia, in turn accused the interim government of using excessive force against peaceful protesters. The military has said protesters have used explosives, guns and homemade bazookas in clashes.

“They are using bullets against people peacefully mobilizing in defence of democracy,” said Mr. Morales, who has talked about returning to Bolivia to finish his term until Jan. 22. “It makes us remember times of military dictatorships.”

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies