Skip to main content

Michael Kovrig, left, and Michael Spavor, the two Canadians detained in China, are shown in these 2018 images taken from video.

/The Associated Press

Twelve months after arresting Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, Chinese authorities have sent their cases to prosecutors, a procedural step that opens the possibility of a trial and should assure them their first access to a lawyer.

At the same time, the Chinese embassy in Ottawa marked the men’s year in detention with a sternly-worded statement that defended their incarceration and reiterated demands that Canada release Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou. She was arrested Dec. 1, 2018, at the Vancouver International Airport, and is fighting extradition to the United States on fraud charges relating to U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor were seized days later by Chinese state security agents, and placed first under a lengthy interrogation by the Ministry of State Security before being formally arrested in May and transferred to police-run detention centres. They have been denied access to families or legal representation, their only exposure to the outside world coming through heavily-monitored 30-minute monthly meetings with consular officials.

Story continues below advertisement

But “the investigative process on the two cases has been completed and they have been transferred to procuratorial authorities for investigation and prosecution,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said Tuesday. Under Chinese law, that means the two Canadians should now be granted the right to see lawyers, Chinese legal experts said, although such access can be delayed.

Chinese procurators have three options: take their cases forward with an indictment, send it back for supplementary investigation or reject the cases altogether, allowing the accused to go free, said Mo Shaoping, a prominent Chinese human-rights lawyer.

“The fact that these two Canadians have been transferred to the procuratorate is necessary and supposed to happen,” he said. They are unlikely to be allowed to see family until their case moves to trial, he said.

Both men are accused of violating Chinese state secrets law.

Still, movement in their cases “is a step forward for sure, and possibly a signal to the Canadian government. It offers the chance of dropping charges, but also of formal indictment – probably depending on the response from Canada,” said Peter Dahlin, the director of Safeguard Defenders, a group that monitors the Chinese judicial system.

Chinese regulations provide numerous avenues for delays and extensions, however, leaving little certainty of how quickly further steps may come.

“At this point, China probably has to maintain the facade that this is a legal issue,” said Michael Caster, a human-rights advocate who is also a senior adviser to Safeguard Defenders.

Story continues below advertisement

“But they may have come to the conclusion that it has reached its course and is doing more harm than good. The best way to resolve it without admitting it was a sham all along would be to hold a trial and convict them but to then kick them out of the country.”

Opposition parties vote to create China committee, handing Liberals first defeat of minority Parliament

The Canadian government has criticized China for what it has called the “arbitrary” arrests of Mr. Kovrig, a former diplomat working for International Crisis Group, and Mr. Spavor, a businessman who arranged trips to North Korea for artists, athletes and business groups.

Global Affairs spokesman Guillame Berube said in a statement Tuesday that the two men’s dention remains their “absolute priority.”

“Canadian officials will continue to provide consular services to them, work tirelessly for their release and seek improvements to the conditions of their detention,” Mr. Berube said.

The Chinese embassy in Ottawa, in its statement, said “there is no such thing as ‘arbitrary detention,’” and urged Canada to “stop making irresponsible remarks.”

The arrest of Ms. Meng, the embassy added, had violated the rights of a Chinese citizen. “China once again urges Canada to correct its mistakes and immediately release Ms. Meng Wanzhou so that she can return to China safely,” it wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

Justice Minister David Lametti told reporters Tuesday that he was troubled that the two Canadians have been denied legal counsel.

“It’s been a year. Our heart goes out to them … it’s our top priority. I know that ministers have been working hard to secure their release. I know they’ve had consular access but it troubles me that they haven’t had any access to legal counsel,” he said.

With reporting from Robert Fife and Steven Chase in Ottawa and Alexandra Li in Beijing

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies