Skip to main content
//empty //empty

In this Dec. 3, 2018, file photo, a guard tower and barbed wire fences are seen around a facility in the Kunshan Industrial Park, in western China's Xinjiang region.

Ng Han Guan/The Associated Press

China warned on Wednesday that U.S. legislation calling for a tougher response to Beijing’s treatment of its Uyghur Muslim minority will affect bilateral co-operation, clouding prospects for a near-term deal to end a trade war.

Expectations of a quick deal had receded already, after U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday it might take until late 2020 to reach an agreement.

Approval by the U.S. House of Representatives of the Uyghur Act of 2019, which still requires passage by the Republican-controlled Senate before being sent to Mr. Trump, has angered Beijing and further strained an already testy relationship.

Story continues below advertisement

Several sources familiar with Beijing’s stand told Reuters the bill could jeopardize the so-called Phase 1 trade deal already fraught with disagreements and complications.

With a new round of U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods scheduled to take effect in less than two weeks, the possibility of another breakdown is growing.

“Do you think if America takes actions to hurt China’s interests we won’t take any action?” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said when asked whether the Uyghur bill would affect the trade negotiations. “I think any wrong words and deeds must pay the due price.”

Negotiators have continued to work on the trade deal. But sources familiar with the talks say the two sides are still wrangling over the details, including whether existing U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will be removed and how much in additional U.S. agricultural products China will buy.

Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Washington and Beijing are “moving closer” to agreeing on how much tariffs would be rolled back in an initial trade deal despite the Hong Kong and Xinjiang issues, citing people familiar with the talks.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told CNBC on Tuesday that staff-level trade negotiations with China were continuing but no high-level trade talks had been scheduled. Planned U.S. tariffs on remaining Chinese imports will take effect on Dec. 15 barring significant progress in the talks, or a deal, he said.

Ms. Hua said China would set no timeline or deadline for a trade deal and would take “decisive” countermeasures to defend its interests if what she called U.S. protectionism and bullying over trade continued.

Story continues below advertisement

She did not elaborate on what the measures might be.

A Chinese official who declined to be identified warned that U.S. implementation of the new round of tariffs scheduled on Dec. 15 would be countered by China with retaliatory tariffs – an outcome the official said would seriously disrupt talks.

Another Chinese official said it may take a very long time for Washington and Beijing to reach a deal if they cannot find a way to strike while “the iron is hot.”

UYGHUR BILL

The Uyghur bill, which was passed 407-1 in the Democratic-controlled House, requires the U.S. president to condemn abuses against Muslims and calls for the closure of mass detention camps in its western region of Xinjiang. It also calls on Mr. Trump to impose sanctions for the first time on a member of China’s powerful politburo, Xinjiang Communist Party Secretary Chen Quanguo.

Beijing called the bill a malicious attack on China, demanded the United States keep it from becoming law and said it would act to defend its interests as necessary.

Vice Foreign Minister Qin Gang made “stern representations” to William Klein, the U.S. embassy’s minister counsellor for political affairs, and urged the United States to stop interfering in China’s domestic affairs, state TV reported.

Story continues below advertisement

The U.S. embassy in China said it would not speculate on China’s possible countermeasures.

“We continue to call on [China] to immediately release all those arbitrarily detained, and to end its draconian policies that for more than two years have terrorized its own citizens in Xinjiang,” it said in a statement.

The White House has yet to say whether Mr. Trump would sign or veto the bill, which contains a provision allowing the president to waive sanctions if he determines that to be in the national interest.

A U.S. State Department spokeswoman said it was closely monitoring developments related to the Uyghur Act and shared congressional concerns about China’s “campaign of repression in Xinjiang.” However, she did not say whether the department supported the bill itself.

In October, the State Department announced visa restrictions on officials believed responsible for abuses in Xinjiang, but did not say if they included Mr. Chen.

Dilxat Raxit, spokesman for the World Uyghur Congress, said the House bill was an important action opposing “China’s continued push of extreme persecution,” and that the organization looks forward to Mr. Trump signing it into law.

Story continues below advertisement

Analysts say China’s response to the passage of the Uyghur bill could be stronger than its reaction to the U.S. law backing Hong Kong protesters. Beijing said on Monday it banned U.S. military ships and aircraft from visiting the island and sanctioned several U.S.-based non-government organizations.

Global Times, an influential tabloid published by the official newspaper of China’s ruling Communist Party, tweeted on Tuesday that Beijing would soon release a so-called unreliable entities list imposing sanctions against those who harm Chinese interests.

It said China was expediting the process for the list because the U.S. House bill would “harm Chinese firms’ interests,” and that “relevant” U.S. entities would be among the targets.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies