Skip to main content

World Committee urges Britain’s next PM to make quick decision on Huawei’s role in 5G networks

A powerful committee of British lawmakers on Friday urged the next prime minister to decide quickly on the role Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. will have in next-generation 5G telecommunications networks to avert more damage to Britain’s international relations.

The U.K. is a battleground in a geopolitical tug-of-war over Huawei, the world’s biggest maker of telecoms networking equipment.

The United States has threatened to cut off intelligence sharing with allies who use Huawei equipment, which it says China could exploit for spying. China has warned Britain that excluding Huawei could hurt investment and trade.

Story continues below advertisement

Britain’s National Security Council, chaired by outgoing Prime Minister Theresa May, discussed the issue in April and decided in principle to block Huawei from critical parts of the 5G network but give it limited access to less sensitive parts.

A final decision was supposed to have been made public in a review of the telecoms supply chain led by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, but Ms. May’s resignation has stalled the process.

Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) said the extent of the delay “is now causing serious damage to our international relationships: a decision must be made as a matter of urgency.”

Three sources told Reuters the government now planned to publish the results of that review as soon as Monday, but that the section on 5G equipment vendors would be “kept back” for the next prime minister to decide.

Ms. May’s replacement, either Foreign Minister Jeremy Hunt or former London mayor Boris Johnson, the front-runner, will be installed next week.

A government spokesman said the results of the review would be announced “in due course” and all network operators would have to comply.

‘GEOSTRATEGIC DECISION’

The ISC said Britain’s cybersecurity chiefs had made clear that the issue was not one country or company, but that national networks had to be able to withstand any attack, malicious action or simple human error.

Story continues below advertisement

The committee said this was best achieved by diversifying suppliers, and the problem for 5G was that only three firms were in the running – Huawei, Nokia Corp. and Ericsson.

“Therefore, including a third company – even if you may have some security concerns about them and will have to set a higher bar for security measures within the system – will, counterintuitively, result in higher overall security,” the ISC said.

Huawei vice-president Victor Zhang said: “We agree that diversity improves resilience in networks.”

The ISC also acknowledged, however, that the government had to take political concerns into account, and so should not do anything to jeopardize the Five Eyes intelligence alliance of the U.S., Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

It argued that China would understand if Huawei were excluded as Beijing would not allow a British company to play a role in its critical national infrastructure.

“This is a geostrategic decision, the ramifications of which may be felt for decades to come,” the committee said.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter