Skip to main content

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden poses for a photo during a visit to the Iowa State Fair, Aug. 8, 2019, in Des Moines, Iowa.

The Associated Press

Former vice-president Joe Biden and Montana Governor Steve Bullock opened the Iowa State Fair’s 2020 presidential blitz on Thursday by blistering President Donald Trump and promising to push new gun restrictions.

“I believe everything the president’s said and done encourages white supremacists,” Mr. Biden said as Mr. Trump continued to take criticism for his handling of back-to-back mass shootings. One of the shooters is believed to have written a racist screed echoing some of Mr. Trump’s incendiary language about immigrants.

Mr. Bullock said Mr. Trump’s rhetoric and behaviour – attacking his critics on the day he travelled to ostensibly console victims’ families in El Paso, Tex., and Dayton, Ohio – are beneath the office he holds.

Story continues below advertisement

“The lies and the statements that divide us by race, gender, geography – we expect more out of our preschoolers now than we do the president of the United States,” Mr. Bullock said.

Mr. Biden and Mr. Bullock are the first of more than 20 candidates – nearly all Democrats – who will speak at the Iowa fairgrounds over the coming days. It’s a rite of passage for would-be presidents, and for Democrats it highlights their challenges in a state like Iowa, a presidential battleground that mixes cultural conservatives and farm country, liberal college towns and plenty of swing voters in between.

Mr. Trump won Iowa comfortably in 2016 after then-president Barack Obama, with Mr. Biden as his running mate, won the state twice. The typical Democratic caucus electorate, meanwhile, leans far more liberal than the general electorate.

Mr. Biden and Mr. Bullock promised to compete both for caucus votes and for the state in November.

“If we can’t win back places we lost, … if we can’t give people a reason to vote for us and not just against him, Donald Trump will win again,” Mr. Bullock said. “The path to victory doesn’t just go through the coasts.”

But first, the caucus is critical for both men – for different reasons.

Mr. Biden, as the national polling leader since he entered the race, needs to demonstrate the strength of a front-runner. Mr. Bullock, meanwhile, is a long shot looking for a slow, steady rise from a state where he has family connections and is comfortable selling his Montana record.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Bullock faces an uphill battle in part because of Mr. Biden’s standing: Both men hail from the more moderate-to-liberal core of the party, warning that a progressive lurch could help re-elect Mr. Trump. But the 53-year-old governor is dwarfed by the universal name recognition of the 76-year-old former vice-president.

The two candidates Thursday reaffirmed their support for new gun restrictions – expanded background checks, bans on certain military-style weapons and ammunition – even as they stopped short of some solutions their more liberal opponents have proposed.

Mr. Bullock said he opposed mandatory buyback programs for military-style weapons, even if Congress bans future manufacture and sales of those guns. Mr. Biden said he’s wary about using executive orders to do anything other than tinker with background checks. He said banning weapons and ammunition must be done through Congress.

California Senator Kamala Harris has said she’d use sweeping executive action on guns if Congress doesn’t act within 100 days of her inauguration.

Mr. Biden and Mr. Bullock dismissed the notion that their positions on guns could be at odds with their promises of winning back areas of the country that flipped to Mr. Trump in 2016.

Mr. Bullock noted that he’s vetoed some measures backed by gun lobby, yet won re-election in Montana anyway on the same day Mr. Trump won the state by 20 percentage points.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Biden, in turn, quickly dismissed some arguments used to push back on restricting some guns and ammunition.

“It violates no one’s Second Amendment rights to say that you can’t own certain weapons,” Mr. Biden said, a reference to the Supreme Court stating explicitly that some regulations are permissible.

Off the fairgrounds, candidates grappled with how far to go in critiquing Mr. Trump. Since the El Paso shooting, Texas Republican Beto O’Rourke has called Mr. Trump a white supremacist. South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg agreed with that label when asked at a forum in Miami sponsored by the National Association of Black Journalists.

But campaigning in Sioux City, Iowa, Ms. Harris stopped short of calling Mr. Trump a white supremacist.

“I think that there’s no question that his words and his language … (have) been about condoning the conduct and certainly accommodating the conduct of white supremacists,” the California senator told reporters. “So, I think it’s a fair conversation to have.”

Pressed on the question, Ms. Harris, one of two major black Democratic candidates, said, “I think you should ask him that question.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Biden accused Mr. Trump on Wednesday of “fanning the flames of white supremacy.”

Associated Press writer Thomas Beaumont contributed from Sioux City, Iowa and Julie Walker contributed from Miami.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter