Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

President Donald Trump's personal attorney Jay Sekulow, center, stands with his son, Jordan Sekulow, left, and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, while arriving at the Capitol in Washington during the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, Saturday, Jan. 25, 2020.

The Associated Press

U.S. President Donald Trump had perfectly valid reasons for freezing military aid to Ukraine, asking that country to investigate his political rivals and refusing to co-operate with a congressional investigation of his actions, the president’s lawyers told his impeachment trial.

In a two-hour opening presentation Saturday morning, Mr. Trump’s legal team largely did not dispute the facts of the case previously laid out by Democratic prosecutors. But they argued that the President’s actions were not a nefarious plot to solicit foreign election interference.

Rather, they said, Mr. Trump was motivated purely by a desire to fight corruption in Ukraine and encourage European countries to share more of the burden of defending the country. White House Counsel Pat Cipollone also appeared to argue against the power of impeachment itself, saying that voting to remove the President from office would be a “completely irresponsible abuse of power.”

Story continues below advertisement

“They’re here to perpetrate the most massive interference in an election in American history we can’t allow that to happen,” he said of the Democrats. “The American people decide elections. They have one coming up in nine months.”

The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives impeached Mr. Trump last month, charging him with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The President withheld US$400-million in military aid to Ukraine, demanded Kyiv tarnish Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and the Democratic National Committee by announcing investigations into them, and stonewalled the House’s inquiry into the matter.

The President is currently on trial before the Republican-majority Senate. It would take a vote by two-thirds of senators to throw him out of office. The prosecution, consisting of seven Democratic House members, spent three days laying out their case against Mr. Trump.

The President’s lawyers began their defence Saturday, and will continue on Monday and Tuesday. Mr. Trump’s legal team went through the basic narrative of the case and argued that each of the President’s actions had an innocuous explanation.

In the July 25 telephone call in which Mr. Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Mr. Biden, Mr. Cipollone pointed to a passage in which Mr. Trump complained that Germany was not providing Ukraine with enough military aid.

This, Mr. Cipollone said, was evidence Mr. Trump withheld the US$400-million for “burden-sharing” reasons: He wanted to push other countries into shouldering more of the burden of helping Kyiv defend itself. Mr. Cipollone did not explain how freezing the aid had helped get Germany to step up its own commitments.

Mike Purpura, another of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, said the President’s request during that call that Mr. Zelensky investigate a debunked conspiracy theory that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 U.S. election to help the Democrats was also above-board. This conspiracy theory was pushed by Russian government-run media outlets in a bid to deflect attention away from the Kremlin’s own 2016 election interference.

Story continues below advertisement

“There is nothing wrong about asking a foreign leader to help get to the bottom of accusations of foreign election interference,” Mr. Purpura said.

The President’s lawyers argued that U.S. diplomats who testified last year that Mr. Trump wanted to trade the military aid for an investigation of Mr. Biden in a “quid pro quo” simply misunderstood Mr. Trump’s intentions. Rather, the lawyers said, Mr. Trump froze the aid because he wanted to see if Mr. Zelensky was serious about fighting corruption generally.

They raised Mr. Trump’s words to Gordon Sondland, the American ambassador to the European Union: “I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo.” The Democrats have previously said Mr. Trump invalidated this denial on that same phone call by also telling Mr. Sondland to continue pushing Mr. Zelensky for the investigations.

And Mr. Trump’s lawyers pointed out that Ukraine never investigated Mr. Biden but ultimately got the military aid anyway. The President released the aid in September, after members of Congress had found out about freeze and his demands for an investigation.

Deputy Counsel to the President Patrick Philbin sought to justify Mr. Trump’s decision to order his administration not to turn over any documents to the House impeachment inquiry, or allow government officials to testify. Mr. Philbin said Mr. Trump was under no obligation to comply with the subpoenas because the House issued them before voting on a resolution authorizing the inquiry.

Adam Schiff, the Democrat serving as the de facto lead prosecutor on the case, said Mr. Trump had not refuted any of the basic narrative of the case. “They’re trying to deflect, distract from, and distort the truth,” he wrote on Twitter. “And they are continuing to cover it up by blocking documents and witnesses.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Republican majority in the Senate earlier this week shut down several Democratic attempts to call witnesses and gather more evidence for the trial.

The trial continues at 1 pm Monday.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies