Skip to main content

Fighting around Tripoli resumed overnight, following a two-day truce observed during the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, Libyan officials said Tuesday.

The two-day ceasefire – proposed by the UN – was the first since the self-styled Libyan National Army led by commander Khalifa Hifter launched an offensive in April to capture Tripoli from a UN-supported but weak government.

Hifter’s forces carried out air strikes overnight on Tripoli’s southern outskirts, the officials said.

Story continues below advertisement

The strikes focused on the road linking the city centre with a shuttered old airport that Hifter’s forces took back in April, as well as the neighbourhoods of Wadi el-Rabie, Khallat el-Fujan and Suq al-Jumaa, the officials said.

The militias allied with Tripoli’s UN-backed government also shelled Hifter’s forces in the southern and eastern outskirts, they said.

Tripoli health officials said no civilian casualties were reported on Tuesday. All officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters.

On Saturday, both sides had accepted the truce ahead of the holiday, though they later each claimed the other had violated the ceasefire.

Authorities at the Mitiga airport, Tripoli’s only functional airport, suspended flights for several hours Sunday after reporting that a shell fell just meters (yards) away from the runway. The Tripoli militias blamed Hifter’s forces for the shelling.

Hifter’s forces did not immediately respond to calls seeking comment but they have shelled the airport in the past, claiming the militias were using it as an air base.

Hifter’s offensive on Tripoli has made little progress amid stiff resistance by the militias. The fighting has killed over 1,100 people, mostly combatants, and displaced more than 100,000 civilians.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies