Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Laurent Berger, leader of the French Democratic Confederation of Labour, leaves the Hotel Matignon, in Paris, on Jan. 10, 2020.

CHARLES PLATIAU/Reuters

Negotiations between the French government and trade unions failed to break the deadlock over pension reform on Friday as both sides stood firm ahead of a fifth day of nationwide protests.

With a public transport strike into its 37th day, President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist government defied unions on Friday with a draft pension reform bill that included a contested clause on raising the retirement age by two years to 64.

Prime Minister Edouard Philippe says the reform must result in a balanced pension budget and that raising the retirement age is the best way to achieve this. France spends the equivalent of 14 per cent of GDP on pension payments.

Story continues below advertisement

The government stand has infuriated the unions, including the reform-minded union CFDT – France’s largest – which on Friday rejected the government’s offer of further talks if in the meantime parliament begins debating the bill.

“We will take part in these talks on one condition: that the outcome is not fixed from the start,” CFDT boss Laurent Berger told reporters.

Philippe’s government has promised to include any alternative solutions as amendments.

Unlike the hardline CGT, the CFDT union agrees with the core principle of the government’s proposal, which is to replace France’s 42 pension systems and different retirement ages with a universal points-based system with the same rights for everyone.

But the CFDT rejects increasing the retirement age, which it says is “blind and unjust.”

For Macron, winning over the CFDT is crucial in breaking the united union front against his reform, as the CGT and other hardline unions want the reform bill withdrawn altogether.

After meeting union leaders on Friday, Philippe said he would send written concrete proposals to unions but he gave no indication of where the government might yield.

Story continues below advertisement

The reform bill – which parliament is due to debate from mid-February – proposes to progressively raise the age at which workers can retire on a full pension to 64 “for the 1965 generation who will retire from 2027.”

The legal retirement age will remain 62 but workers who leave at that point will not receive their maximum pension.

“We could not have a text that is silent on the age (for a balanced pension budget),” Laurent Pietraszewski, secretary of state for pensions, told Reuters. “It is at the heart of the reform.”

A fourth day of nationwide anti-reform demonstrations on Thursday brought 452,000 people on the streets, down sharply from 615,000 on Dec. 17 and over 800,000 on Dec. 5.

Macron has already stared down the unions over reform of the state-run SNCF railways and French labour laws and is now holding his ground once again.

But early last year, he made concessions worth €17-billion to quell months of often violent “yellow vest” protests against the high cost of living and elitism that posed the severest challenge yet to his authority.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies