Skip to main content

U.S. President Donald Trump vented over White House leaks Monday as a new tell-all book commands attention, an anonymous writer detailing “resistance” in the administration remains at large and a former staffer reveals more private recordings of the Commander-in-chief.

But while Mr. Trump continues to insist privately that he wants leakers punished – in particular, the author of an unsigned New York Times opinion piece – it remained unclear if his administration would mete out any discipline. Spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said no lie detectors were being used to smoke out the writer of the op-ed, although she insisted the West Wing would like to see an investigation.

Ms. Huckabee Sanders said it’s up to the U.S. Justice Department to make that determination. “But someone actively trying to undermine the duly elected President and the entire executive branch of government, that seems quite problematic to me and something they should take a look at,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

A White House official has said Mr. Trump was just venting over the essay and wasn’t ordering federal prosecutors to take action. It also doesn’t appear that the essay revealed any classified information, which would be a crucial bar to clear before a leak investigation could be considered. The Justice Department said it will not confirm or deny investigations.

It appeared to be another instance of the President versus the administration, as Mr. Trump proceeded on one track while the agencies largely moved on another. There was fear among some advisers that if the President felt that his staff or the Justice Department was not carrying out his order to find the leakers, then he could feel compelled to make changes.

At a White House press briefing, Ms. Huckabee Sanders slammed the book Fear, from veteran journalist Bob Woodward, as “careless and reckless.”

Mr. Woodward staunchly defended his work, saying on NBC’s Today show that Defence Secretary Jim Mattis and White House chief of staff John Kelly “are not telling the truth” when they deny making disparaging remarks about Mr. Trump attributed to them.

“These are political statements to protect their jobs,” Mr. Woodward said.

Trump officials have rushed to distance themselves from the op-ed and from Mr. Woodward’s book, both of which depict a White House mired in dysfunction, with aides disparaging the Republican President and working to prevent him from making disastrous decisions.

It was not clear how aggressive White House efforts were to root out the op-ed writer, although a person close to the White House who was not authorized to speak publicly said officials had focused in on a few names.

Story continues below advertisement

Some Trump aides, including lawyer Rudy Giuliani, have suggested the President would be within his authority to order a formal investigation. But it would set off alarm bells throughout Washington if the President were to mobilize the Justice Department to investigate a matter in which no crime was committed or classified information disclosed.

Mr. Trump spent the weekend complaining about the book, as well as the op-ed writer. He argued that the person purposely put the piece in the Times to anger him, and he has continued to focus on identifying and firing the author, even as some advisers have urged him to let the matter go, said a person familiar with the President’s thinking but not authorized to discuss private conversations.

Mr. Trump tweeted Monday that he has been subjected to “Phony books, articles and T.V. ‘hits’ like no other pol has had to endure.”

Amid the drama, former White House staffer Omarosa Manigault Newman sought to seize some of the spotlight by releasing a recording she said was of Mr. Trump talking to junior aides during a communications meeting. Mr. Trump jumps from topic to topic, talking about the real “Russia story” involving his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton; the deadly Niger ambush on American soldiers; and economic gains.

The op-ed was not the only thing on Mr. Trump’s mind as he called around to advisers over the weekend, according to two people familiar with the conversations. He told allies that he was certain that his position on the national-anthem controversy contributed to the NFL’s lower television ratings for its Thursday night opener – although ratings were largely up for the league’s first Sunday of games.

Mr. Trump also derided his predecessor’s return to politics. While the President expressed annoyance that Barack Obama was taking credit for the country’s economic success, he told one adviser the former president’s increased visibility would give Mr. Trump more chances to attack a figure who remained very unpopular with his base.

Story continues below advertisement

Set for public release Tuesday, Fear has thrown an already chaotic White House into disarray. On Monday, it was ranked as the top-selling book on Amazon.

Mr. Trump tweeted that “the Woodward book is a Joke – just another assault against me, in a barrage of assaults, using now disproven unnamed and anonymous sources. Many have already come forward to say the quotes by them, like the book, are fiction. Dems can’t stand losing. I’ll write the real book!”

Chief of staff Mr. Kelly is quoted calling Mr. Trump “an idiot,” and Mr. Mattis is quoted saying Mr. Trump has the understanding of “a fifth- or sixth-grader.” Both deny the statements.

Mr. Woodward, who has shared in two Pulitzer Prizes, staunchly defended the integrity of his reporting and said the book “is as carefully done as you can do an excavation of the reality of what goes on.”

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter