Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Dr. Lindsey Thomas, a retired forensic pathologist, testifies during Derek Chauvin's murder trial at the Hennepin County Courthouse, in Minneapolis, Minn., on April 9, 2021.

The Associated Press

The chief medical examiner who ruled George Floyd’s death a homicide testified Friday that the way police held him down and compressed his neck “was just more than Mr. Floyd could take,” given the condition of his heart.

Dr. Andrew Baker, the Hennepin County medical examiner, took the stand at the murder trial of former Officer Derek Chauvin for pressing his knee on or close to Mr. Floyd’s neck for what prosecutors said was as much as 9 1/2 minutes as the 46-year-old Black man lay on the pavement last May.

Asked about his finding that police “subdual, restraint and neck compression” led to Mr. Floyd’s death, Dr. Baker said that Mr. Floyd had severe underlying heart disease and an enlarged heart that needed more oxygen than normal to function, as well as narrowing of two heart arteries.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Baker said being involved in a scuffle raises adrenalin, which asks the heart to beat even faster and supply more oxygen.

“And in my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of that, those heart conditions,” the medical examiner said.

Other medical experts, including a leading lung specialist, have gone further, testifying that Mr. Floyd died from asphyxia – or insufficient oxygen – because his breathing was constricted as he lay on his stomach with his hands cuffed behind his back, his face jammed against the ground and Mr. Chauvin’s knee on his neck.

Dr. Baker has not ruled asphyxiation as a cause of Mr. Floyd’s death. And at one point, he said he is not an expert on lack of oxygen because he doesn’t treat living people, and he would defer certain questions to experts on breathing.

Dr. Baker also said that based on his viewing of the video, he believed Mr. Chauvin’s knee was “primarily on the back, or the side or the area in between on Mr. Floyd’s neck.” And he said it didn’t appear from the video that his knee would have blocked one of the carotid arteries in the neck that supply blood to the brain.

Mr. Chauvin, 45, is charged with murder and manslaughter in Mr. Floyd’s death May 25. Mr. Floyd was arrested outside a neighbourhood market after being accused of trying to pass a counterfeit US$20 bill.

Bystander video of Mr. Floyd crying that he couldn’t breathe as onlookers yelled at the white officer to get off him sparked protests and scattered violence around the U.S.

Story continues below advertisement

Chauvin attorney Eric Nelson has argued that the now-fired white officer did what he was trained to do and that Mr. Floyd’s illegal drug use and underlying health conditions killed him. An autopsy found fentanyl and methamphetamine in Mr. Floyd’s system.

Ted Sampsell-Jones, a law professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, said evidence about Mr. Floyd’s cause of death is shaping up to be the biggest weakness for prosecutors. He said that with Dr. Baker’s testimony, the jury is starting to see that the prosecution has been forced to distance itself from its own medical examiner.

“It could possibly raise a reasonable doubt about cause of death,” he said.

However, Prof. Sampsell-Jones said the legal standard for establishing causation is quite low. The state has to show only that Mr. Chauvin’s conduct was a substantial contributing cause.

“If the state had to show that Chauvin’s conduct was the sole or even primary cause of death, the case would be in real trouble,” he said.

In his testimony, Dr. Baker said that neither Mr. Floyd’s heart problems nor drugs caused his death. Under cross-examination, though, he agreed with Mr. Nelson that those factors “played a role” in the death.

Story continues below advertisement

A medical expert who testified Thursday said a healthy person subjected to what Mr. Floyd endured would also have died.

Mr. Nelson asked Dr. Baker whether he has certified deaths by fentanyl overdose at levels lower than that seen in Mr. Floyd’s blood, and Dr. Baker said yes. But Dr. Baker also noted that levels of fentanyl must be considered in the context of how long someone had used the drug, any tolerance built up to it, and what other substances may be involved.

The medical examiner said that he did not watch the harrowing video of the arrest before examining Mr. Floyd so that he would not be unduly influenced by what he saw.

“I did not want to bias my exam by going in with any preconceived notions that might lead me down one pathway or another,” he said.

Other medical experts called as prosecution witnesses have likewise blamed Mr. Floyd’s death on the way he was pinned down on the ground.

Dr. Lindsey Thomas, a forensic pathologist who retired in 2017 from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office and did not work on Mr. Floyd’s case, testified earlier Friday that she agreed with Dr. Baker’s findings, but appeared to go further, saying the “primary mechanism of death” was insufficient oxygen.

Story continues below advertisement

She said she reached that conclusion mostly from video that showed Mr. Floyd struggling to breathe.

During cross-examination, Mr. Nelson noted that Mr. Floyd’s bigger heart needed more blood and was working hard in a moment of stress and adrenalin, and that one of his arteries had a 90 per cent blockage.

The defence attorney pressed Dr. Thomas by posing a hypothetical question.

“Let’s assume you found Mr. Floyd dead in his residence. No police involvement, no drugs, right? The only thing you found would be these facts about his heart. What would you conclude to be the cause of death?” Mr. Nelson asked.

“In that very narrow set of circumstances, I would probably conclude that the cause of death was his heart disease,” Dr. Thomas replied.

In response to another hypothetical posed by Mr. Nelson, she agreed that she would certify Mr. Floyd’s death as a drug overdose if there were no other explanations.

Story continues below advertisement

But during re-questioning, prosecutor Jerry Blackwell ridiculed the defence attorney’s hypotheticals.

“Aren’t those questions a lot like asking, ‘Mrs. Lincoln, if we take John Wilkes Booth out of this ...” Mr. Blackwell began, before Mr. Nelson objected.

For the first time, a seat designated for Mr. Chauvin’s family was occupied Friday, by a woman. She wasn’t immediately identified. Mr. Chauvin’s marriage ended in divorce in the months after Mr. Floyd’s death.

Also on Friday, Judge Peter Cahill called in a juror and questioned her about whether she had been subject to any outside influences. She replied that she briefly saw TV coverage with the sound off and said that her mother-in-law had texted her, “Looks like it was a bad day” but that she didn’t reply.

The judge allowed her to remain on the jury.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies