Skip to main content

Kyle Rittenhouse speaks with his attorney, Mark Richards, before the start of the day at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wis., on Nov. 12.POOL/Reuters

The judge in the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse said on Friday he would allow the jury to consider that the teenager provoked an encounter with one of two men he is charged with killing during racial-justice protests in a Wisconsin city last year.

The ruling is a boost for prosecutors because it opens the door for them to argue that Mr. Rittenhouse was the aggressor, which would raise the bar for the teenager’s argument that he was ambushed and acted in self-defence.

Mr. Rittenhouse, 18, is charged in the killing of Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and the wounding of Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, in Kenosha on Aug. 25, 2020. The shootings took place during sometimes-violent protests that followed the police shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake. Mr. Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty.

Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney James Kraus showed grainy drone video of the Rosenbaum shooting as he argued that Mr. Rittenhouse raised his AR-15-style rifle shortly before the deadly encounter, initiating the confrontation. Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder stepped down from the bench to watch the video on a TV with Mr. Rittenhouse standing close behind him leaning in and looking on. The judge agreed the issue should be up the jury to decide.

“It’s the jury’s case and I think they should make the critical decisions,” Justice Schroeder said. “My decision will be to submit the case to the jury with the provocation instruction and you can argue the strength or lack of strength of the evidence.”

The shootings, which took place against a backdrop of days of rioting and arson, have divided the United States.

Supporters of Mr. Rittenhouse say he was justified in defending himself, while critics say he was a vigilante who inserted himself into a violent situation while illegally possessing a firearm.

Earlier, Justice Schroeder had ruled against the prosecution’s request to allow the jury to consider a lesser charge in the killing of Mr. Rosenbaum, but he said he would allow the inclusion of lesser charges in the killing of a second man, Mr. Huber, who was shot after swinging a skateboard at Mr. Rittenhouse.

Prosecutors were seeking approval for less serious charges to be considered after days of testimony in which considerable evidence was presented to support the teen’s self-defence argument. Lesser charges lower the burden of proof for conviction.

Mr. Rittenhouse is charged with first-degree reckless homicide in the death of Mr. Rosenbaum, first-degree intentional homicide in the death of Mr. Huber and attempted first-degree intentional homicide in the shooting of Mr. Grosskreutz. He faces life in prison if convicted on those counts.

Justice Schroeder said the evidence in Mr. Rosenbaum’s shooting did not show that Mr. Rittenhouse could win acquittal on first-degree reckless homicide but be found guilty on the second, failing to meet the requirement for inclusion of a lesser charge.

With Mr. Huber, Mr. Rittenhouse’s lawyers said they would accept jury consideration of second-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide but not second-degree reckless homicide.

Unlike the higher charges, second-degree reckless homicide does not require proof that the teen exhibited an “utter disregard” for life. The judge then agreed to allow the lesser charges.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.