Skip to main content

A photo provided from Daniel Angress of Ruth Kleuger receiving a standing ovation while speaking to Parliament on Holocaust Remembrance Day in Berlin in 2016.

DANIEL ANGRESS/The New York Times News Service

Ruth Kluger, whose unforgiving memoir of growing up Jewish in Nazi-occupied Vienna and escaping death in a concentration camp unsentimentally redefined the conventional mythos of the heroic Holocaust survivor, died Oct. 5 at her home in Irvine, California. She was 88.

The cause was complications of bladder cancer, said her sons Daniel and Percy Angress.

Published in English in 2001 when she was about 70, Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered spared no one with its blunt and haunting narrative – not her cultured neighbours who stopped suppressing their latent anti-Semitism when Germany annexed Austria; her adult relatives who she believed should have foreseen the “final solution” for European Jews and fled the continent with their families; her liberators who swiftly wearied of hearing about the Holocaust; or even her tormented self.

Story continues below advertisement

“We survivors are not responsible for forgiveness,” she once told reporters in Austria. “I perceived resentment as an appropriate feeling for an injustice that can never be atoned for.”

She was age 6 when the Nazis marched into Vienna. Her father fled to France, where he was deported and later killed. Her stepbrother, who was six years older and whom she idolized, was also murdered. She and her mother laboured in several concentration camps, where she survived by lying about her age and then by escaping from a forced march ordered by their German guards as the war was ending.

Mother and daughter immigrated to the U.S., where Prof. Kluger would ultimately become a professor of German literature, “impatient and absent-minded, prone to drop things intentionally or through clumsiness, even breakables like dishes and love affairs; a woman who is perennially on the move, changing jobs and homes at the drop of a hat and inventing reasons afterward while she is packing; a person who runs away as soon as she gets nervous, long before she smells danger.

“Because running away was the best thing I ever did, ever do,” she wrote. “You feel alive when you run away. It’s the ultimate drug, in my experience.”

Her memoir recounted a symbiotic but tense relationship with her often depressed mother and generational conflicts over strategy and survival. “There were good reasons my mother lost her mind,” Prof. Kluger said in an interview with the German magazine Spiegel in 2006.

Still Alive distinguished itself in the Holocaust canon on several counts: Prof. Kluger did not reflexively equate mere survival with a happy ending to her horror story, and her narrative through a woman’s experience and feminist perspective was unconventional.

“It is wise, witty, blunt, brutally honest and unsentimental, and as moving as only the naked personal truth, and its bold, razor-sharp analysis, can be,” was how Prof. Kluger’s book was described by The Guardian. “She doesn’t insist on being right, but she does insist on being heard.”

Story continues below advertisement

A Washington Post reviewer called it “an act not of running away but of confrontation, of facing her past head-on and allowing no rationalization or romanticization of it.” The New York Times review criticized the author’s “outdated feminism” and said her troubled relationship with her mother “clouds much of the narrative of this otherwise stark, moving book.”

Ruth Susan Kluger was born Oct. 30, 1931, in Vienna to Dr. Viktor Kluger, a gynecologist, and Alma (Gredinger) Kluger, a homemaker with a son from an earlier marriage.

After the German annexation in March, 1938, Jews were barred from public schools. Ruth’s father was allowed to treat only Jewish patients and was imprisoned for illegally performing an abortion on a destitute non-Jew who had pleaded with him for help.

After he was released and fled to France, she often wondered why he left without his family. “‘Are you so ignorant that you have to ask that?’” a cousin told her years later. “‘Who would have thought then that children and women were in danger?’ My father was in danger, so he had to go.”

As a child she might have been repatriated to Britain, but her mother insisted on remaining in Vienna until 1942, she wrote, when they were transported, first to Theresienstadt, the model camp exhibited to Red Cross inspectors, and later to Auschwitz-Birkenau and Christianstadt.

Begrudgingly accepting her mother’s advice, which was also validated by another prisoner working as a clerk, she gave her age to the guards as 15 instead of 12, which qualified her for forced labour instead of extermination.

Story continues below advertisement

As the war was ending, she remembered her mother telling the first American soldier they encountered that they had escaped from a concentration camp. “His gesture was unmistakable, she wrote. “He put his hands over his ears and turned away. My mother translated. He had had his fill of people who claimed they had been in the camps.”

“Here was my first American, and he deliberately closed his ears,” she recalled. “One thing, I figured, was certain: This war hadn’t been fought for our sake.”

After the war, she studied philosophy and history at the Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule in Regensburg while her mother worked as an interpreter. In 1947, they moved to New York where Ruth graduated with a bachelor’s degree in English from Hunter College in 1950. She worked as a librarian and earned a master’s in English and a doctorate in German literature from the University of California, Berkeley.

Her marriage in 1953 to Werner Angress, who taught European history, ended in divorce. In addition to her sons, she leaves four grandchildren.

She taught at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, the University of Kansas, the University of Cincinnati, the University of Virginia and Princeton. She first joined the University of California, Irvine, faculty in 1976, left for Princeton and returned after six years in 1986. She retired in 1994.


Story continues below advertisement

In the late 1980s, she was directing the university’s Education Abroad Program in Göttingen, Germany, when she was struck by a bicycle. Emerging from a coma, her suppressed memories of the Holocaust were unleashed. She wrote her autobiography, published as To Continue to Live: A Childhood, in German in 1992 and the English version nearly a decade later.

“It is breathtakingly honest,” said Peter Fritzsche, a history professor at the University of Illinois and a family friend. “She was a survivor but also resisted as well as recognized the notion that her memoir had a ‘happy end.’”

Prof. Kluger urged her readers against “feeling good about the obvious drift of my story away from the gas chambers and the killing fields and toward the postwar period, where prosperity beckons.”

But she was not without hope. In 2016, at the request of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, she addressed the Parliament on Holocaust Remembrance Day and praised Germany for welcoming refugees from war-torn Syria.

She also came to terms with her mother, who had remarried and had worked as a physiotherapist before she died in 2000. Prof. Kluger wrote that she “felt a sense of triumph because this had been a human death, because she had survived and outlived the evil times and had died in her own good time, almost 100 years after she was born.”

Her mother had lived long enough to develop a last love, with her great-granddaughter. “More than 90 years between them,” Prof. Kluger wrote, “but whenever they were together, chatting and touching, they met in a present that miraculously stood still for them, time frozen in space made human. Perhaps redeemed.”

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies