Skip to main content

World South African President seeks urgent judicial review of allegations he misled Parliament

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said on Sunday he would seek an urgent judicial review of a report in which the country’s graft watchdog concluded that he misled Parliament over a campaign donation.

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s report followed an investigation by the watchdog into a 500,000-rand ($47,000) donation to Mr. Ramaphosa’s 2017 campaign for the leadership of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) from the CEO of Bosasa, a services company.

Mr. Ramaphosa said the report’s findings were not rational, based in fact or arrived at through a fair and impartial process, and that he would seek a judicial review of the report, its conclusions and the remedial action it recommended.

Story continues below advertisement

“After careful study, I have concluded that the report is fundamentally and irretrievably flawed,” Mr. Ramaphosa told a media briefing, adding that it was therefore appropriate the courts make a final and impartial judgment on the matter.

A spokesman for the public protector did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Ms. Mkhwebane, who began the investigation following a complaint from South Africa’s opposition, said on Friday she found the President had “deliberately misled” Parliament and violated the executive ethics code in regards to the donation.

The saga has proven a headache forMr. Ramaphosa, who has staked his reputation on cleaning up deep-rooted corruption and reviving Africa’s most developed economy, and provided ammunition for his enemies - namely an ANC faction loyal to his predecessor, Jacob Zuma.

Mr. Ramaphosa initially told Parliament that the money received by his son Andile was obtained for services he had provided, but later corrected this by saying the payment was actually a donation towards his campaign.

The remedial actions Ms. Mkhwebane recommended included that the speaker of the National Assembly demand the publication, within 30 days of receiving the report, of all donations received by Mr. Ramaphosa.

She also instructed the chief prosecutor to investigate whether Mr. Ramaphosa’s campaign had laundered money in its handling of donations.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter