Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Supporters of the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) conduct an election campaign motorcade in Yangon, Myanmar on Thursday, Nov. 5, 2020.

Thein Zaw/The Associated Press

One of two Muslims allowed to run for the ruling party in Buddhist-majority Myanmar’s general election on Sunday, Sithu Maung, worries fake news on Facebook could damage his chances.

Within a torrent of racist abuse and misinformation posted about him ahead of the polls are false claims he plans to close Buddhist monastic schools and to advocate for the teaching of Arabic.

“They use race and religion to attack me,” the 33-year-old told Reuters in the commercial capital of Yangon, where he is standing for a seat won by the ruling party in the last election.

Story continues below advertisement

“These days people use social media more than ever … and when they see false information 10 times it becomes the truth.”

Social media companies face a global challenge to stop disinformation around elections, including the 2020 U.S. vote. In Myanmar, the stakes for Facebook are particularly high after previous accusations it helped incite genocide.

Half of Myanmar’s 53 million people use Facebook, which for many is synonymous with the internet.

Facebook executives told Reuters hate speech in Myanmar was “near historic lows” after it invested in resources from artificial intelligence language and photo detection to measures to slow the spread of viral content.

But civil society groups have found dozens of networks of accounts, pages, and groups spreading ethnically and religiously charged falsehoods that they fear could lead to strife and undermine the second election since the end of hard line army rule in 2011.

Reuters separately found more than two dozen interconnected pages and accounts with a combined reach in the hundreds of thousands. The majority were removed after Reuters flagged them to Facebook.

“There’s a short-term immediate concern of all this disinformation and hate speech fuelling real-world violence,” said Jes Kaliebe Petersen, CEO of tech hub Phandeeyar, part of the Myanmar Tech Accountability Network (MTAN), a civil society group co-ordinating efforts to reduce risks posed by social media.

Story continues below advertisement

Harmful content, he said, is “spreading like wildfire”.

The government of leader Aung San Suu Kyi, her ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) and the election commission did not respond to requests for comment.

‘TYPICAL’

Although the NLD is widely expected to win the election easily, as it did in 2015, there is precedent for social media hate speech leading to violence in Myanmar.

Anti-Muslim rumours on Facebook were widely seen as helping to trigger deadly riots in 2012 and 2014. In 2017, violent speech on Facebook was blamed for supporting an army crackdown on Rohingya Muslims that drove more than 730,000 to flee Myanmar.

But Rafael Frankel, Facebook’s director of public policy for Southeast Asia, told Reuters that ahead of the election: “What we have seen so far is typical and nothing in any way out of the ordinary from what we would see in other parts of the world when an election is happening.”

Even before campaigning got under way, Facebook deleted 280,000 items in Myanmar for hate speech in the second quarter of 2020, up from 51,000 in the first quarter.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, it is verifying accounts for some politicians – including Sithu Maung – and giving them a direct line for complaints.

Facebook also said it had taken down hundreds of accounts for “co-ordinated inauthentic behaviour” including about 70 it traced to members of Myanmar’s military on Oct. 8.

Among the blocked army-linked accounts were two that had attacked Sithu Maung with ethnic and religious slurs.

Twenty pages and pro-military accounts found by Reuters published simultaneous posts and included some newly created ones that replicated others that had only recently been blocked by Facebook.

The army did not respond to a request for comment.

DISINFORMATION

It is not the first time Facebook has blocked pages linked to Myanmar’s army: In 2018, it banned 20 top military officials and organisations for inauthentic behaviour, including commander in chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing.

Story continues below advertisement

This week, Min Aung Hlaing accused unspecified social media platforms of bias in their treatment of Myanmar politics as he questioned the credibility of the elections more generally. Those claims were widely spread by pro-military accounts and pages found by Reuters and removed by Facebook.

But it is not only the army that has been using Facebook to spread disinformation, researchers say.

Some pages that Facebook has taken down had content supportive of Suu Kyi’s NLD.

Opposition politicians, including from the army-linked Union Solidarity and Development Party, the ruling NLD’s biggest rival, have also been among the targets: branded as Muslim sympathisers or close to China by accounts whose origins are unclear.

The USDP did not respond to a request for comment.

Researchers say that the online vitriol is amplified by numerous “inauthentic” networks that spread narratives through interconnected pages, groups, and fake accounts. Some pages, including dozens found by Reuters, style themselves as independent news or entertainment sources, and post the same content simultaneously on Facebook and other social media.

Story continues below advertisement

Others have taken out paid ads to promote politicians, including army chief Min Aung Hlaing – reaching more than a million people – but ran them without a disclaimer in violation of Facebook policies on political advertising.

“Facebook has taken down a few networks of assets involved in this type of problematic behaviour, but there is a lot more,” said MTAN researcher Victoire Rio.

“These malicious actors always seem to come back, often using the same names and logos, which calls into question Facebook’s ability to tackle these issues comprehensively.”

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors

This content appears as provided to The Globe by the originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies