Skip to main content

World Timing threatens public vote on Missouri abortion law: ACLU

Timing threatens to stymie efforts to let the public vote on a new Missouri law banning abortions at eight weeks of pregnancy or later after the state Supreme Court on Friday refused to intervene to force the state’s top election official to act quickly.

At issue is a push by the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri to put the anti-abortion law on the 2020 ballot. ACLU attorneys now worry that if Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft doesn’t act fast to process the petition, the organization could be left with as little as two weeks to collect the more than 100,000 signatures need to put the law to a vote.

The ACLU had asked Supreme Court judges to force Ashcroft to certify a ballot title for the referendum by July 18 in order to give the organization enough time to collect signatures before the Aug. 28 deadline. But the Supreme Court on Friday decided that it won’t weigh in on the case.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s pretty apparent that the secretary, with an assist from the attorney general, is trying to run down the clock so the people don’t have a chance to vote,” ACLU Acting Executive Director Tony Rothert said. “We were hoping to get a court order to get them to move expeditiously, but at this point it’s on them to do their jobs in a way that protects the constitutional right of the people to have a referendum.”

A spokesman for Republican Attorney General Eric Schmitt, whose office is representing the secretary of state, declined to comment.

Ashcroft in June rejected the ACLU’s referendum petition on abortion, as well as several other petitions, on constitutional grounds. An appellate court panel on Monday ruled Ashcroft was wrong to do so and allowed the ACLU to continue its campaign for a referendum.

Ashcroft has not appealed, but on Friday he said he interpreted the appellate court ruling to mean that he “didn’t have the authority to reject the referendum when I did – that the proper time for that would be after potentially thousands of petition pages have been circulated and tens of thousands of signatures have been gathered.”

“I will follow the court’s ruling,” Ashcroft said in a statement. “My office will prepare the proposed ballot summary statement and forward it to the attorney general’s office for review and follow the timeline that the law requires.”

Most of the wide-ranging abortion law, including the eight-week ban, takes effect Aug. 28. The ACLU needs to collect enough signatures by then to put the law on hold pending a public vote.

ACLU attorneys wrote in court filings to Supreme Court judges that unless they intervene, Ashcroft’s office “might well lose the case but nonetheless succeed in keeping the referendum off the ballot.”

Story continues below advertisement

The legal dispute over the abortion law comes as the state’s only abortion clinic fights its own legal battle to continue providing the service, despite a licensing dispute with the state health department .

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter