Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

French gendarmes escort one unidentified accused as he arrives on the second day of the trial of the Paris' November 2015 attacks at the Paris courthouse on the Ile de la Cite, in Paris, on Sept. 9.

GONZALO FUENTES/Reuters

The main suspect in the 2015 Islamist attack that killed 130 people in Paris disrupted the trial for a second consecutive day on Thursday to make political statements from the dock, prompting the judge to briefly suspend the hearing.

Salah Abdeslam, 31, is believed by prosecutors to be the only surviving member of the Islamic State cell that carried out the gun and bomb attacks on bars, restaurants, the Bataclan concert hall and the Stade de France stadium on Nov. 13, 2015.

The presiding judge granted him the right to speak in a discussion about which victims’ representatives would be allowed to participate in the trial.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Abdeslam asked whether the victims of wars in Syria and Iraq would also be invited to testify, and alleged that he and his fellow defendants were being treated as if they had already been found guilty.

He also said that some of his co-accused – those suspected of helping him get back to Brussels, where he is from, after the attacks – were not involved in the Paris attack plot, and had only helped him out of generosity because they were his friends.

Judge Jean-Louis Périès repeatedly told Mr. Abdeslam that he was straying off the topic of the hearing, and eventually cut off his microphone.

“Let me remind you that you have had five years to explain yourself and you said nothing,” Judge Périès told Mr. Abdeslam, referring to the time police and magistrates spent investigating the attacks and preparing the trial.

Mr. Abdeslam would be welcome to speak later in the proceedings, Judge Périès said, adding: “Now is not the moment, this is a technical debate.”

Mr. Abdeslam continued to talk after that, and the judge ordered a suspension of the hearing. It resumed about 25 minutes later.

On the opening day of the trial on Wednesday, Mr. Abdeslam told the court he was a soldier of the Islamic State, the ultraradical militant group, and later shouted out in the courtroom that he and his co-defendants were being treated like dogs.

Story continues below advertisement

Some representatives of victims and survivors of the 2015 attacks have said they expected such outbursts and were doing their best to ignore him. Others expressed dismay that Mr. Abdeslam was using the trial as a platform to express his views.

“It’s very hard for the victims to hear those kinds of statements,” said lawyer Catherine Szwarc, who represents seven victims.

Gaétan Honoré, 44, who was in the Bataclan theatre on the night of the attacks and managed to escape unhurt, said he wondered how Mr. Abdeslam “can hang on to that kind of attitude, with the victims [in the courtroom].”

The start of the trial, “which was meant to be technical, is rich in emotions, and not necessary pleasant emotions,” he said. “This will last nine months. It will be quite a challenge.”

Victim testimonies are set to begin on Sept. 28. Questioning of the accused will start in November, but they are not set to testify about the night of the attacks until March. The verdict is expected in late May, 2022.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies