Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh listens during his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 4, 2018.

Joshua Roberts/REUTERS

U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday stepped up his defence of his U.S. Supreme Court nominee, saying it was hard to imagine Brett Kavanaugh committed a sexual assault and that it would be unfortunate if his accuser did not testify before the Senate.

With Mr. Trump’s effort to cement conservative control of the country’s highest court on a knife’s edge, Senate judiciary committee chairman Chuck Grassley set a Friday morning deadline for Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, to decide if she will talk to lawmakers.

Prof. Ford has said Judge Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge, sexually assaulted her in 1982 when both were high-school students in Maryland. Judge Kavanaugh has called Prof. Ford’s allegation “completely false.”

Story continues below advertisement

If Prof. Ford opts not to testify, Judge Kavanaugh’s chances for confirmation in the Republican-led Senate could be boosted, with senators in Mr. Trump’s party so far remaining largely supportive.

“I think it’s not fair to Judge Kavanaugh for her not to come forward and testify,” moderate Republican Senator Susan Collins, whose vote could be crucial, said in a radio interview.

Mr. Grassley’s committee wants prepared testimony from Prof. Ford by Friday and an answer on whether she will accept its invitation to testify to the panel on Monday, either publicly or privately. The committee also has invited Judge Kavanaugh to testify on Monday.

Prof. Ford’s lawyers said on Tuesday she would testify before the committee only if the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) first investigated her allegation. The FBI has said it is not investigating the matter, a decision backed by Republicans.

“It is not the FBI’s role to investigate a matter such as this,” wrote Mr. Grassley, who also sent a letter to committee Democrats formally rejecting their bid for the FBI to investigate.

Later on Wednesday, Mr. Grassley wrote to the senior Democrat on the committee, Dianne Feinstein, requesting she immediately provide an unredacted copy of the letter Prof. Ford sent her in July about the assault allegation, saying he must review it before Monday’s hearing.

‘Multiple witnesses’

In a statement on Wednesday, a lawyer for Prof. Ford said her client was willing to co-operate with the committee, but criticized its plan to have only Prof. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh testify.

Story continues below advertisement

“There are multiple witnesses whose names have appeared publicly and should be included in any proceeding,” Prof. Ford’s lawyer Lisa Banks said.

“The rush to a hearing is unnecessary, and contrary to the committee discovering the truth,” Ms. Banks said.

Prof. Ford’s allegation has jeopardized Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the lifetime post on the Supreme Court, which was previously on track toward confirmation.

“Look, if she shows up and makes a credible showing, that will be very interesting and we’ll have to make a decision,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House.

“But I can only say this: He’s such an outstanding man – very hard for me to imagine that anything happened,” the President said.

“If she shows up, that would be wonderful. If she doesn’t show up, that would be unfortunate,” Mr. Trump added, calling the situation “very unfair” to his nominee.

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Ford has accused Judge Kavanaugh of attacking her and trying to remove her clothing while he was drunk at a party in 1982 when he was 17 years old and she was 15. Prof. Ford’s lawyers said in a letter to Mr. Grassley on Tuesday she had faced “vicious harassment and even death threats” since coming forward on Sunday. Mr. Grassley said he was disturbed to learn of the threats.

The confirmation fight comes just weeks before Nov. 6 congressional elections in which Democrats are seeking to wrest control of Congress from the Republicans.

Any defections from the Republicans’ narrow Senate majority could sink the nomination and deal a major setback to Mr. Trump, who has been appointing more conservatives to the high court and the broader federal judiciary.

Democratic U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill, who faces a tough re-election battle in Missouri, which Mr. Trump won in the 2016 presidential election, said on Twitter on Wednesday that she would vote against Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation because of “his positions on several key issues, most importantly the avalanche of dark, anonymous money that is crushing our democracy.”

‘Finding the truth’

Republican panel member Lindsey Graham said on Twitter that requiring an FBI investigation of a 36-year-old allegation “is not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections.”

The U.S. Justice Department has said the FBI sent Prof. Ford’s initial letter making the allegation against Judge Kavanaugh to the White House and considers its role in the matter complete.

Story continues below advertisement

Democrats have said the White House can order a more detailed FBI investigation, as occurred during the 1991 confirmation process for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas after he was accused of sexual harassment. Republicans have said the FBI would be doing nothing more than what committee staffers could achieve by interviewing Judge Kavanaugh and Prof. Ford.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday showed a growing number of Americans opposing Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. In the poll, conducted from Sept. 11-17, 36 per cent of U.S. adults surveyed did not want Judge Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, up six percentage points from a similar poll a month earlier, while 31 per cent favoured Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment.

Palo Alto University issued a statement supporting Prof. Ford. The university’s president called Prof. Ford’s decision to come forward courageous.

Committee Republicans have planned for only Judge Kavanaugh and Prof. Ford to testify, but Democrats want other witnesses, too.

Democratic Senator Doug Jones said Mark Judge, Judge Kavanaugh’s high-school friend, should be subpoenaed if he refuses to testify. Prof. Ford has said Mr. Judge witnessed the alleged assault.

Mr. Judge’s lawyer said in a letter to the committee on Tuesday that Mr. Judge did not recall the incident and did not wish to testify.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies