Skip to main content

World Trump now says ‘I don’t know’ his new acting attorney general, contradicting earlier claims he is a ‘great guy’

Matthew Whitaker’s future at the helm of the Justice Department appeared uncertain at best Friday as President Donald Trump denied even knowing the man he had named acting attorney general just two days earlier. The Senate’s top Republican predicted a permanent replacement could be named soon for Whitaker, who is now overseeing the Trump-Russia probe.

The comments from Mr. Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell came as Mr. Whitaker’s past business ties and remarks on special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and other topics were drawing scrutiny from Democrats and ethics groups.

Speaking to reporters Friday, Mr. Trump said, “I don’t know Matt Whitaker.” That contradicted Mr. Trump’s remarks on Fox News last month, when he called Mr. Whitaker “a great guy” and said, “I mean, I know Matt Whitaker.”

Story continues below advertisement

President Donald Trump, facing criticism about his controversial appointment to replace Jeff Sessions, claimed Friday: 'I don't know Matt Whitaker.' Earlier, though, Trump called him 'a great guy' and said he did know him. The Associated Press

Mr. McConnell, meanwhile, said, “I think this will be a very interim AG.” Another Republican senator, Susan Collins of Maine, said she was concerned by some of Mr. Whitaker’s past comments and called for legislation that would place limits on his ability to fire special counsel Mr. Mueller. That would include specifying that only a Senate-confirmed Justice Department official — which Mr. Whitaker is not – could dismiss Mr. Mueller.

Mr. Whitaker, a Republican Party loyalist and chief of staff to just-ousted Attorney General Jeff Sessions, was elevated Wednesday after his boss was forced from his job by Mr. Trump. The new position handed him oversight of Mr. Mueller’s investigation into possible ties between Russia and Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Since Wednesday, Mr. Whitaker has faced pressure from Democrats to recuse himself from overseeing Mr. Mueller based on critical comments he made about the investigation before joining the Justice Department last year.

Those included an op-ed article in which he said Mr. Mueller would be straying outside his mandate if he investigated Trump family finances and a radio interview in which he maintained there was no evidence of collusion between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign. He also tweeted an ex-prosecutor’s opinion piece that described a “Mueller lynch mob,” which he said was “worth a read.”

There have also been reports about Mr. Whitaker’s past comments questioning the power and reach of the federal judiciary, and about his ties to an invention-promotion company that was accused of misleading investors. The Wall Street Journal on Friday published an email revealing an FBI investigation into the company, World Patent Marketing Inc. The July 10, 2017, email was from an FBI victims’ specialist to someone who the newspaper said was an alleged victim of the company. A Justice Department spokeswoman told the Journal that Mr. Whitaker was “not aware of any fraudulent activity.”

Mr. Whitaker himself stayed out of the public debate Friday. He sent a department-wide note after his appointment in which he said, “As we move forward, I am committed to leading a fair Department with the highest ethical standards, that upholds the rule of law, and seeks justice for all Americans.”

Legal scholars are debating the constitutionality of his appointment, with some lawyers saying it is illegal because he has not been confirmed by the Senate.

Story continues below advertisement

Despite Mr. Trump’s current distancing himself from Mr. Whitaker, two Republicans close to the president said he had enjoyed Mr. Whitaker’s TV appearances and the two had struck a bond. Those TV appearances included one on CNN in which Mr. Whitaker suggested that the Mr. Mueller probe could be starved of resources.

Mr. Trump told associates that he felt Mr. Whitaker would be “loyal” and would not have recused himself from the Russia probe as Sessions had done, according to the Republicans, who were not authorized to speak publicly about private conversations and commented only on condition of anonymity.

On Friday, Mr. Trump said he had not spoken with Mr. Whitaker about Mr. Mueller’s investigation, which until now has been overseen by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Mr. Rosenstein told reporters Friday that based on his experiences with Mr. Whitaker, “I think he’s a superb choice for attorney general.”

Of the scrutiny Mr. Whitaker is facing, Mr. Trump said, “It’s a shame that no matter who I put in they go after.”

“He was very, very highly thought of, and still is highly thought of, but this only comes up because anybody that works for me, they do a number on them,” Mr. Trump said.

Story continues below advertisement

In Kentucky, meanwhile, Mr. McConnell said he expects Mr. Trump to nominate a new permanent attorney general “pretty quickly.” Mr. McConnell said he expects Mr. Whitaker to be “a very interim” appointee.

“The president has said repeatedly he’s not going to dismiss the Mueller investigation,” Mr. McConnell told reporters at Kentucky’s Capitol. “He’s said repeatedly it’s going to be allowed to finish. That also happens to be my view.”

Mr. Trump has not said whom he will nominate to permanently replace Sessions.

Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie is said to be a candidate, along with Labor Secretary Alex Acosta and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, among others.

Mr. Trump told reporters he has not discussed the post with Christie, who he said was “a friend of mine” and “a good man.”

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter