Skip to main content

World UN demands Britain relinquish control over Indian Ocean islands

In this file photo taken on Oct. 7, 2001, a U.S. Air Force B-1B bomber takes off from the Diego Garcia base on a strike mission against Afghanistan, during Operation Enduring Freedom. Britain leased the island to the United States in 1966, paving the way for construction of an air base that required the forced removal of some 2,000 people.

HANDOUT/AFP/Getty Images

The United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly demanded on Wednesday that Britain give up control over the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean within six months, dealing a diplomatic blow to Britain and the United States.

Britain, which has overseen the region since 1814, detached the Chagos Islands in 1965 from Mauritius – a colony that gained independence three years later – to create the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). It is home to a joint British and U.S. airbase.

The UN resolution adopted on Wednesday backs a non-binding advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in February, which found Britain had acted unlawfully in the decolonization process and should relinquish control.

Story continues below advertisement

The resolution won the support of 116 countries, while 56 abstained and only Australia, Hungary, Israel and the Maldives joined Britain and the United States in voting against it. Fifteen countries did not vote.

The UN General Assembly had requested the court’s opinion in a resolution adopted in June, 2017, with 94 votes in favour, 15 against and 65 abstentions. The Hague-based institution is the top UN court for interstate disputes.

UN General Assembly resolutions are non-binding but can carry political weight. Britain and the United States had written to all UN members to ask them to vote against the resolution.

Britain leased the Chagos Archipelago’s biggest island, Diego Garcia, to the United States in 1966, paving the way for construction of an airbase that required the forced removal of some 2,000 people.

“Its status as a UK territory is essential to the value of the joint U.S.-UK based on the BIOT and our shared security interests,” wrote acting U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Jonathan Cohen. “The joint base is critical to our mutual security as well as broader efforts to ensure global security.”

Diego Garcia became an important U.S. base during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, acting as a launch pad for long-range bombers. The U.S. lease lasts until 2036. British UN Ambassador Karen Pierce said that, under Britain’s agreement with the United States, the islands had to remain a British territory until at least then.

Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth said his country was prepared to enter into an agreement with United States or Britain or both, to be allowed unhindered operation of the base.

Story continues below advertisement

“It is therefore difficult to understand the U.K.’s position, unless it is one whereby Mauritius is not considered to be a trusted partner – a position which is deeply offensive to Mauritius, and to every member of the African continent,” he told the General Assembly.

As part of Britain’s 1965 separation agreement with Mauritius, it pledged to cede the islands when they were no longer needed for defence purposes.

Richard Gowan, International Crisis Group UN director, said Britain would never win Wednesday’s vote as many UN member states were “very proud of the General Assembly’s history of fighting colonialism during the Cold War, and see this as an extension of that legacy.”

However, he added: “This vote is a symbolic blow for the U.K., which sees the UN as an important vehicle for its influence after Brexit.”

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter