Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Cardinal Theodore McCarrick is seen at the North American College, in Rome, in a Feb. 14, 2013, file photo.

Alessandro Bianchi/Reuters

Pope John Paul II promoted ex-U.S. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick in 2000 despite rumours of his sexual misconduct, a Vatican report found, one of a series of failings by popes and officials who let him rise through the ranks regardless of repeated allegations against him.

McCarrick, a highly influential figure in the American Church, was expelled from the Roman Catholic priesthood last year after a Vatican investigation found him guilty of sexual crimes against minors and adults and abuse of power.

With testimony from 90 witnesses and dozens of documents, letters and transcripts from Vatican and U.S. Church archives, the 450-page document offers a remarkable reckoning by an institution known for its secrecy, portraying a man long able to convince superiors of his innocence.

Story continues below advertisement

Even the current pope, Francis, was questioned for the report, which the Vatican said he ordered to be published “for the good of the universal Church”.

The report said that “credible evidence” that the former archbishop of Washington, D.C. had abused minors when he was a priest in the 1970s did not surface until 2017.

But it said the U.S. Church hierarchy was aware of consistent rumours that after McCarrick became a bishop in the early 1980s he preyed on adult male seminarians.

“During extended interviews, often emotional, the persons described a range of behaviour, including sexual abuse or assault, unwanted sexual activity, intimate physical contact and the sharing of beds without physical touching,” the report’s introduction says.

McCarrick has said he had no recollection of child abuse and has not commented publicly on allegations of misconduct with adults. Now aged 90, he is living in isolation.

Barry Coburn, McCarrick’s lawyer, said in an e-mail that there would be no comment.


The report has gained significance since it was ordered by Pope Francis in 2018 and one of McCarrick’s alleged victims has since sued the U.S. Church in a trial expected to home in on what officials knew.

Story continues below advertisement

Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of the abuse tracking group, called it “the most significant document on the abuse crisis to come from the Church,” particularly the revelations about Pope John Paul.

But she said Pope Francis should have done more and the report lets him “off the hook.”

The report said there was “no credible information” suggesting misconduct before McCarrick’s appointments in the 1980s, but that in hindsight, the Vatican’s investigations of later allegations against McCarrick were of a “limited nature”.

In 1999, Cardinal John O’Connor advised Pope John Paul II that it would be imprudent to promote McCarrick because of “rumours” of sexual misconduct with seminarians in Metuchen and Newark dating back to the 1980s.

An investigation by the Vatican ambassador to the United States, requested by John Paul, “confirmed that McCarrick had shared a bed with young men” but said there was no certainty that he had engaged in sexual acts.

On Aug. 6, 2000, McCarrick wrote to Pope John Paul’s private secretary to rebut the allegations made by Cardinal O’Connor.

Story continues below advertisement

“McCarrick’s denial was believed,” the report said.

In November, 2000, Pope John Paul appointed McCarrick archbishop of Washington, D.C., one of the most prestigious posts in the U.S. Church. There, he hobnobbed with world leaders and shone as a star fundraiser for the Church.

The report said investigations in 2019-2020 determined that three of the four bishops had provided “inaccurate and incomplete” information about McCarrick’s sexual conduct. The omissions “impacted the conclusions of John Paul II’s advisers and, consequently, of John Paul II himself,” the report said.

It went on to say the Vatican never received a direct complaint from a victim and it was plausible, given the information it had, to “characterize the allegations against him as 'gossip or ‘rumours’”.


John Paul died in 2005 and was declared a saint in 2014. The report said his willingness to believe McCarrick’s denial was likely influenced by his experience in his native Poland when the communist government used “spurious allegations against bishops to degrade the standing of the Church”.

The Vatican, then under newly-elected Pope Benedict XVI, told McCarrick he should withdraw as bishop after it became aware of more information from a victim identified as “Priest 1”, the report said.

Story continues below advertisement

Benedict accepted McCarrick’s resignation in 2006.

In 2008, three top Vatican officials suggested the pope approve a canonical investigation “to determine the truth and, if warranted, impose an ‘exemplary measure’”.

A Vatican official instead asked McCarrick to “maintain a lower profile and minimize travel for the good of the Church”. But, because there were no “explicit instructions from the Holy Father” (Pope Benedict), McCarrick continued public activities.

The report says Benedict likely rejected the idea of an investigation because there were “no credible allegations of child abuse”, because McCarrick had sworn on his oath as a bishop that he had not sexually abused anyone and “there was no indication of any recent misconduct” (with adults).

After he was elected in 2013, Pope Francis became aware of “allegations and rumours” concerning McCarrick’s past behaviour, the report said.

“Believing the allegations had already been reviewed and rejected by Pope John Paul, and well aware that McCarrick was active during the papacy of Benedict XVI, Pope Francis did not see the need to alter the approach that had been adopted in prior years,” the report says.

Story continues below advertisement

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, a former Vatican ambassador, has accused Francis of allowing McCarrick to continue his travels and lifting “sanctions” he said were imposed by Benedict. The Vatican has said there were no formal sanctions.

The report said no documentation of any abuse by McCarrick was given to Pope Francis before 2017, when McCarrick was accused of abusing a minor in the 1970s, leading to the Vatican investigation that led to his expulsion from the priesthood.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies