Skip to main content

Migrant children are pictured at a Tornillo, Tex., detention centre near the Mexican border on Monday.

MIKE BLAKE/Reuters

The White House has rejected the idea of legislation that would end its policy of separating migrant children from their parents unless it also includes broad immigration reform and funding for a wall along the border with Mexico.

“The President doesn’t just want to see a Band-Aid put on this,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters on Monday. “This isn’t something we can tinker with. We have to actually fix the entire system.”

Images of children housed in tent camps and lying on mats on the floor of a shuttered Walmart along the Texas border have become a flashpoint in the country’s debate over immigration reform, drawing widespread condemnation as the House of Representatives prepares to vote on two competing Republican immigration bills this week.

Story continues below advertisement

Lawmakers in both parties rushed on Monday to devise a targeted legislative fix.

A son and father from Honduras are taken into custody by U.S. Border Patrol agents near the U.S.-Mexico Border on June 12, 2018, near Mission, Tex. The asylum seekers were then sent to a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processing centre for possible separation.

John Moore/GETTY IMAGES

GOP senators said they were considering legislation that would keep migrant families together, provide additional judges to shorten waits for detained families, and provide facilities the migrants to stay in. California Senator Dianne Feinstein said she had the backing of the Democratic caucus for a bill would that prohibit the separation of migrant children from their parents except in cases of child abuse or trafficking.

Globe editorial: With his policy on immigrant children, Trump shows he has no limits

But the White House signaled it would oppose any narrow fix. Ms. Sanders said President Donald Trump’s priorities, like funding a border wall and tightening immigration laws, must also be fulfilled as part of any legislation.

“We want to fix the whole thing,” she said. “We don’t want to tinker with just part of it.”

The policy, part of a zero-tolerance approach to illegal border crossings that Attorney-General Jeff Sessions announced earlier this year, separated nearly 2,000 migrant children from their parents between mid-April and the end of May, according to Department of Homeland Security figures.

SOUTHWEST BORDER FAMILY UNIT

APPREHENSIONS, FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE

2018, BY SECTOR

1

2

3

4

5

San Diego

El Centro

Yuma

Tucson

El Paso

1,996

1,613

8,775

4,765

2,806

6

7

8

9

Big Bend

Del Rio

Laredo

Rio Grande

543

1,509

361

36,745

Calif.

N.M.

Tex.

Ariz.

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

MEXICO

0

300

KM

Family unit apprehensions by country,

fiscal year-to-date 2018

Guatemala

29,278

Honduras

20,675

El Salvador

7,167

Mexico

1,461

MURAT YÜKSELIR / THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE:

TILEZEN; OPENSTREETMAP CONTRIBUTORS;

HIU; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

SOUTHWEST BORDER FAMILY UNIT

APPREHENSIONS, FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE

2018, BY SECTOR

1

2

3

4

5

San Diego

El Centro

Yuma

Tucson

El Paso

1,996

1,613

8,775

4,765

2,806

6

7

8

9

Big Bend

Del Rio

Laredo

Rio Grande

543

1,509

361

36,745

Calif.

N.M.

Tex.

Ariz.

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

MEXICO

0

300

KM

Family unit apprehensions by country,

fiscal year-to-date 2018

Guatemala

29,278

Honduras

20,675

El Salvador

7,167

1,461

Mexico

MURAT YÜKSELIR / THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE:

TILEZEN; OPENSTREETMAP CONTRIBUTORS;

HIU; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

SOUTHWEST BORDER FAMILY UNIT APPREHENSIONS,

FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE 2018, BY SECTOR

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

San Diego

El Centro

Yuma

Tucson

El Paso

Big Bend

Del Rio

Laredo

Rio Grande

1,996

1,613

8,775

4,765

2,806

543

1,509

361

36,745

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

NEW MEXICO

TEXAS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Family unit apprehensions by country,

fiscal year-to-date 2018

Guatemala

29,278

MEXICO

Honduras

20,675

El Salvador

7,167

Mexico

1,461

0

150

KM

MURAT YÜKSELIR / THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: TILEZEN; OPENSTREETMAP

CONTRIBUTORS; HIU; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

Speaking at a meeting of the National Space Council in Washington, Mr. Trump blamed “horrible laws” for the policy, but said Democrats are obstructing Republican efforts to reform immigration.

Story continues below advertisement

He pointed to the political crisis engulfing German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition government over migration as a cautionary tale for U.S. lawmakers. “The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility,” he said. “You look at what’s happening in Europe, you look at what’s happening in other places. We can’t allow that to happen to the United States. Not on my watch.”

Related: Canada’s Immigration Minister credits outreach efforts for drop in border crossers

The Trump administration’s hard-line stand on immigration has drawn sharp criticism from across party lines.

All living former first ladies, both Republican and Democrat, have opposed the policy. In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Laura Bush called family separation “immoral. And it breaks my heart.” Melania Trump issued a statement through a spokesperson that she “hates to see children separated from their families and hopes both sides of the aisle can finally come together to achieve successful immigration reform.” Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told CNN that Mr. Trump “could stop this policy with a phone call.”

U.S. Border Patrol agents prepare to take a group of asylum seekers into custody on June 12, 2018, near McAllen, Tex.

John Moore/GETTY IMAGES

The UN High Commissioner for human rights, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, called on the U.S. government to immediately end the practice. “The thought that any state would seek to deter parents by inflicting such abuse on children is unconscionable,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Trump is set to meet with House Republicans on Tuesday to discuss two recent proposals for immigration reform legislation. The White House has said the President would sign either bill that makes it to his desk.

Both pieces of legislation aim to meet Mr. Trump’s “four pillars” for immigration reform: ending a diversity visa lottery, building a border wall, limiting family-based migration and ensuring a pathway to citizenship for young people known as “Dreamers” who were brought to the United States illegally as children and were granted work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Families separated, children detained: What we know so far about Trump’s ‘zero-tolerance’ policy

The fate of the Dreamers has deeply divided the Republican Party. A conservative bill written by House Judiciary Committee chair Bob Goodlatte proposes deep cuts to legal immigration, would authorize spending of US$124-billion for border security over five years, and grant Dreamers renewable residency permits rather than green cards, limiting their prospects for citizenship.

A second bill put together late last week by Republican leaders, moderate Republicans and White House officials would also clamp down on legal immigration, but would allow many Dreamers to qualify for green cards eventually, and proposes US$25-billion for construction of a border wall with Mexico. It also seeks to prohibit children from being separated from their parents while they are in federal custody.

Story continues below advertisement

Protesters participate in a demonstration against the separation of families in Otay Mesa, Calif., on June 10.

SANDY HUFFAKER/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

The bills will face a tough hurdle in Congress. Democrats are expected to vote against them, meaning a successful bill would require support from all but 18 of the 235 House Republicans. Either bill would also face a divided Senate that has already rejected several immigration proposals this year.

Senior White House officials have scrambled to respond to the growing outcry.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said at a White House press briefing that the federal government does not separate families that claim asylum at official ports of entry. She defended the administration’s policy toward asylum seekers detained at illegal border crossings, and called the conditions at holding centres for children “humane.”

“Parents who entered illegally are by definition criminals,” she said. “Here is the bottom line: We are enforcing the laws as they exist on the books. As long as illegal entry remains a criminal offence, DHS will not look the other way.”

Ms. Nielsen said the family breakups will continue until Congress changes laws to make it possible to keep families together while they are detained and to deport them more easily. “Apprehension without detention and removal is not border security,” she said, calling Congress “cowardly” for criticizing the administration’s policies.

Federal policies have been on the books for years allowing illegal migrants to face criminal prosecution, although previous administrations have made exceptions for families and children who claimed asylum.

With reports from Adrian Morrow and Associated Press

Video released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows the inside of a detention facility where children, reportedly separated from their parents, are being held. The video was shot by the government agency during a media tour of the facility Sunday.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter