Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

In this 2018 file photo, prosecutor Fatou Bensouda speaks at the International Criminal Court, in The Hague, Netherlands.

Bas Czerwinski/The Associated Press

The International Criminal Court has authorized a formal investigation of alleged war crimes by U.S. and Taliban forces in Afghanistan, setting the stage for a confrontation with U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration.

The decision Thursday by senior ICC judges in The Hague has sparked widespread praise from human-rights groups, but it triggered a vehement reaction from the Trump administration, which has already threatened to impose financial sanctions and visa bans on any ICC officials who assist in an investigation of U.S. citizens.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called it a “reckless” decision by a “renegade” court. He promised more measures to shield U.S. citizens from the court.

Story continues below advertisement

“This is a truly breathtaking action by an unaccountable, political institution masquerading as a legal body,” he told reporters in Washington.

The investigation could mark the first time U.S. officials are held criminally liable for involvement in the torture of detainees in Afghanistan. The investigation will also examine alleged crimes by the Taliban and by Afghan security forces.

The ICC’s chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, reported in 2016 that there is a “reasonable basis” to believe that U.S. soldiers and agents of the Central Intelligence Agency committed war crimes such as torture and rape in Afghanistan.

At least 61 Afghan detainees appear to have been subjected to “torture, cruel treatment [and] outrages upon personal dignity” by U.S. soldiers between 2003 and 2014, while CIA agents “appear to have subjected at least 27 detained persons to torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity and/or rape” from 2002 to 2008 in Afghanistan and in secret detention centres in Poland, Romania and Lithuania, the prosecutor said in her report.

These alleged crimes “appear to have been committed as part of approved interrogation techniques,” she said.

While the United States is not a member of the ICC, its military forces and CIA agents could be subject to the court’s investigation because their alleged crimes were committed in ICC member countries, including Afghanistan and the Eastern European countries.

The Trump administration has fought tooth and nail against the proposed ICC investigation, revoking Ms. Bensouda’s entry visa last year. She responded by saying she would not be deterred from her investigation and has continued to visit United Nations headquarters in New York to give briefings to the UN Security Council.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Bensouda requested the ICC’s authorization for her investigation in 2017, but her request was rejected last year by the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber, which ruled that the investigation would not serve the “interests of justice” because it was unlikely to receive sufficient co-operation from Afghanistan, the United States and others.

She appealed the ruling, and a hearing was held in December. On Thursday the court’s appeals chamber authorized the investigation, ruling that the lower court has misinterpreted some of the court’s rules.

The lower court’s reasoning about the “interests of justice” was “cursory, speculative and did not refer to information capable of supporting it,” the appeals chamber said.

“There is no indication that the Pre-Trial Chamber considered the gravity of the crimes and the interests of victims as articulated by the victims themselves,” it added.

The appeals chamber also rejected the lower court’s argument that the prosecutor’s investigation should be limited to incidents that were mentioned in her original report. No such limit should be imposed, the appeals chamber ruled.

The ICC’s decision Thursday could help defuse criticism of the court by African politicians, who have long complained that the ICC is focusing on crimes in Africa rather than crimes by more powerful countries in Europe and North America.

Story continues below advertisement

The ruling could also have implications for Canada. Human-rights activists have long called for an investigation of possible war crimes by Canadian troops who transferred Afghan detainees into the custody of Afghan security forces when torture was common in detention facilities. An open-ended investigation by the ICC could look at Canadian actions in Afghanistan.

Human-rights groups welcomed the decision by the ICC judges. The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, in a tweet on Thursday, said the ruling was an “important step for justice in Afghanistan’s long war.”

Amnesty International’s head of international justice, Solomon Sacco, said the ruling is “an historic moment where the International Criminal Court has reversed a terrible mistake and decided to stand by the victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by all sides to the conflict in Afghanistan.”

In a statement, Mr. Sacco said the ICC represents “the first true hope of justice” for the victims of the Afghanistan war. “This is a decision that will be extremely popular with those fighting for justice and deeply unpopular with the parties to the conflict, including powerful states that attempted to bully the court and who eluded it for so long.”

Param-Preet Singh, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the ruling “reaffirms the court’s essential role for victims when all other doors to justice are closed.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies