Skip to main content

U.S. Politics Britain’s U.S. ambassador resigns in wake of leaked comments about Trump administration

In this 2017 photo, British Ambassador Kim Darroch hosts a National Economists Club event at the British Embassy in Washington.

The Canadian Press

Britain’s ambassador to Washington quit on Wednesday after days of stinging criticism from Donald Trump, leading to accusations that Boris Johnson, the favourite to be the next British prime minister, had “thrown him under the bus/”

Memos from Kim Darroch describing the Trump administration as inept were leaked to a British newspaper, infuriating the U.S. president, who launched a Twitter attack on both the envoy and outgoing prime minister Theresa May, who had given Darroch her full support.

As a spat between the two close allies intensified, Trump said he would sever ties with the “very stupid” Darroch and called May “foolish.”

Story continues below advertisement

The initial American response to the resignation took the long view. “The United States and the United Kingdom share a bond that is bigger than any individual, and we look forward to continuing that partnership,” a State Department spokeswoman said.

Johnson, who could become prime minister later this month if grassroots Conservatives elect him as party leader, refused to back Darroch in a televised leadership debate on Tuesday night.

Darroch, who said his position had become untenable, had watched the debate, a diplomatic source told Reuters and another source familiar with the envoy’s thinking said the former London mayor’s comments “were a factor” in his decision to resign.

“He (Johnson) has basically thrown this fantastic diplomat under the bus to serve his own personal interests,” said junior foreign minister Alan Duncan. “His sort of disregard for Sir Kim Darroch and his refusal to back him was, in my view, pretty contemptible.”

‘CLUMSY AND INEPT’

In confidential memos dating from 2017 to the present, Darroch, 65, had said reports of infighting in the White House were “mostly true.” Last month, he described confusion within the administration over Trump’s decision to call off a military strike on Iran.

“We don’t really believe this Administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional; less unpredictable; less faction-riven; less diplomatically clumsy and inept,” Darroch wrote in one cable.

It led to a scathing tirade from the U.S. president.

Story continues below advertisement

“The wacky Ambassador that the UK foisted upon the United States is not someone we are thrilled with, a very stupid guy,” he tweeted, describing Darroch as a “pompous fool”.

Darroch had been due to step down at the end of the year.

“Since the leak of official documents from this Embassy there has been a great deal of speculation surrounding my position,” he said in his resignation letter.

“The current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like.”

An inquiry is underway into who leaked the memos, and why.

“Somebody has, for whatever malicious reasons, sought to either damage the UK-U.S. relationship or indeed Sir Kim personally,” British trade minister Liam Fox told reporters.

Story continues below advertisement

“I don’t know what the motivations would be at this stage but it is very important that we find out who actually carried out this particularly damaging act.”

Britain prides itself on its “special relationship” with its closest ally and Trump himself described it as “the greatest alliance the world has ever known” during a lavish state visit to Britain last month.

That relationship is of particular importance to London now, as it hopes to strike a major trade deal with Washington when Britain leaves the European Union.

Darroch, a career diplomat who was previously Britain’s envoy to the EU, had been accused by some Brexit supporters of being biased toward the bloc.

Trump himself had previously suggested that Nigel Farage, now leader of the Brexit Party, would be a good choice as ambassador, irritating British officials.

Farage said this week he was not the right man for the job, but on Wednesday, after Darroch’s resignation, tweeted: “The right decision, time (to) put in a non-Remainer who wants a trade deal with America.”

Story continues below advertisement

May said the government did not share Darroch’s views of the Trump administration, but that British ambassadors should have the freedom to give frank assessments, and that it was a matter of great regret that he had felt he had to quit.

‘LICKSPITTLE’

During a campaign visit on Wednesday, Johnson, who was himself foreign minister until a year ago, called Darroch “a superb diplomat,” adding that whoever leaked the documents had “done a grave disservice to our civil servants”.

The main opposition Labour Party said Darroch had been bullied out by Trump and because of Johnson’s “pathetic lickspittle response”.

“It makes a laughing stock out of our government,” said Emily Thornberry, Labour’s foreign affairs spokeswoman.

“(Johnson) claims to regard Winston Churchill as his hero. But just imagine Churchill allowing this humiliating, servile, sycophantic indulgence of the American president’s ego to go unchallenged.”

The head of Britain’s diplomatic service, Simon McDonald, said it was unprecedented for a head of state, friendly or hostile, to refuse to work with British ambassadors, who are generally professional diplomats, not political appointees.

Story continues below advertisement

The last time there was a problem with an envoy to Washington was in 1856, he said.

Johnson says he should be the one to replace May because his insistence on leaving the EU as scheduled on Oct. 31, with or without a transition agreement, will spur the EU to give Britain a better deal than the one she secured in two years of talks but failed to get through parliament.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter