Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

U.S. President Donald Trump, seen here on Jan. 30, 2020, has denied doing anything wrong, disputing that the aid was part of a 'quid pro quo' for investigations and contending executive privilege shielded documents and advisers from testimony.

LEAH MILLIS/Reuters

The Trump administration says in a court filing that two dozen e-mails revealing details of U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision-making regarding withholding military assistance to Ukraine, which goes to the heart of his impeachment, are protected from a lawsuit under “presidential privilege.”

The existence of the 24 e-mails was acknowledged in a late Friday filing by the Justice Department in response to a lawsuit by the Center for Public Integrity that seeks the release of the e-mails without redaction. In December, the non-profit organization received heavily blacked out versions of the e-mails.

Heather Walsh, a lawyer for the White House Office of Management and Budget, told the court in the Friday filing that the e-mails “reflect communications by either the President, the Vice-President, or the President’s immediate advisers regarding Presidential decision-making about the scope, duration and purpose of the hold on military assistance to Ukraine.” Thus, she writes, the e-mails are privileged.

Story continues below advertisement

The filing was first reported by The Washington Post.

The two articles of impeachment that brought Mr. Trump to trial in the Senate stem from the President’s decision to withhold military aid to Ukraine. House Democrats allege that Mr. Trump abused his power by asking Ukraine to announce investigations of political rival Joe Biden and other Democrats in exchange for releasing the aid. House Democrats also charged Mr. Trump with obstruction of Congress for refusing to turn over documents and provide witnesses.

Mr. Trump has denied doing anything wrong, disputing that the aid was part of a “quid pro quo” for investigations and contending executive privilege shielded documents and advisers from testimony.

The legal team defending Mr. Trump in the Senate trial has argued that even if the aid were held up, Mr. Trump did so because of concerns of corruption in Ukraine. Additionally, the defence team has argued that even if Mr. Trump held up the aid for an investigation of a political rival, it would not amount to a valid reason for impeachment or for removal from office.

Senate Republicans voted Friday to deny Senate Democrats’ demands that new evidence and new witnesses be considered during the trial. A vote to convict or acquit Mr. Trump was expected Wednesday, with acquittal all but assured in the Republican-led chamber.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies