Skip to main content

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., talks to reporters on the morning after the first public hearing in the impeachment probe of President Donald Trump on his effort to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents, on Capitol Hill in Washington on Nov. 14, 2019.

The Associated Press

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi invited U.S. President Donald Trump to testify in front of investigators in the House impeachment inquiry ahead of a week that will see several key witnesses appear publicly.

Pushing back against accusations from the President that the process has been stacked against him, Ms. Pelosi said Mr. Trump is welcome to appear or answer questions in writing, if he chooses.

“If he has information that is exculpatory, that means ex, taking away, culpable, blame, then we look forward to seeing it,” she said in an interview that aired on Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation. Mr. Trump “could come right before the committee and talk, speak all the truth that he wants, if he wants,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer echoed that suggestion.

“If Donald Trump doesn’t agree with what he’s hearing, doesn’t like what he’s hearing, he shouldn’t tweet. He should come to the committee and testify under oath. And he should allow all those around him to come to the committee and testify under oath,” Mr. Schumer told reporters. He said the White House’s insistence on blocking witnesses from co-operating begs the question: “What is he hiding?”

The comments come as the House intelligence committee prepares for a second week of public hearings as part of its inquiry, including with the man who is arguably the most important witness. Gordon Sondland, Mr. Trump’s ambassador to the EU, is among the only people interviewed to date who had direct conversations with the President about the situation because the White House has blocked others from co-operating with what they dismiss as a sham investigation. And testimony suggests he was intimately involved in discussions that are at the heart of the investigation into whether Mr. Trump held up U.S. military aid to Ukraine to try to pressure the country’s President to announce an investigation into Democrats, including former U.S. vice-president Joe Biden, a leading 2020 candidate, and his son, Hunter.

Multiple witnesses overheard a phone call in which Mr. Trump and Mr. Sondland reportedly discussed efforts to push for the investigations. In private testimony to impeachment investigators made public on Saturday, Tim Morrison, a former U.S. National Security Council aide and long-time Republican defence hawk, said Mr. Sondland had told him he was discussing Ukraine matters directly with Mr. Trump.

Mr. Morrison said Mr. Sondland and Mr. Trump had spoken approximately five times between July 15 and Sept. 11 – the weeks that US$391-million in U.S. assistance was withheld from Ukraine before it was released.

And he recounted that Mr. Sondland told a top Ukrainian official in a meeting that the vital U.S. military assistance might be freed up if the country’s top prosecutor “would go to the mic and announce that he was opening the Burisma investigation.” Burisma is the gas company that hired Hunter Biden.

Mr. Morrison’s testimony contradicted much of what Mr. Sondland told congressional investigators during his own closed-door deposition, which the ambassador later amended.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Trump has said he has no recollection of the overheard call and has suggested he barely knew Mr. Sondland, a wealthy donor to his 2016 campaign. But Democrats are hoping he sheds new light on the discussions.

“I’m not going to try to prejudge his testimony,” Democratic Representative Jim Himes said on Fox News Sunday. But he suggested, “it was not lost on Ambassador Sondland what happened to the President’s close associate Roger Stone for lying to Congress, to Michael Cohen for lying to Congress. My guess is that Ambassador Sondland is going to do his level best to tell the truth, because otherwise he may have a very unpleasant legal future in front of him.”

The committee will also be interviewing a long list of others. On Tuesday, they’ll hear from Mr. Morrison along with Jennifer Williams, an aide to U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence, Alexander Vindman, the director for European affairs at the National Security Council, and Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine.

On Wednesday the committee will hear from Mr. Sondland in addition to Laura Cooper, a deputy assistant secretary of defence, and David Hale, a State Department official. And on Thursday, Fiona Hill, a former top NSC staffer for Europe and Russia, will appear.

Mr. Trump, meanwhile, continued to tweet and retweet a steady stream of commentary from supporters as he bashed “The Crazed, Do Nothing Democrats” for “turning Impeachment into a routine partisan weapon.”

“That is very bad for our Country, and not what the Founders had in mind!!!!” he wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

He also tweeted a doctored video exchange between Representative Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House intelligence committee, and Republican Representative Jim Jordan, in which Mr. Schiff said he did not know the identity of the whistle-blower whose complaint triggered the inquiry. The clip has been altered to show Mr. Schiff wearing a referee’s uniform and loudly blowing a whistle.

In her CBS interview, Ms. Pelosi vowed to protect the whistle-blower, whom Mr. Trump has said should be forced to come forward despite long-standing whistle-blower protections.

“I will make sure he does not intimidate the whistle-blower,” Ms. Pelosi said.

Mr. Trump has been under fire for his treatment of one of the witnesses, the former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, whom Mr. Trump criticized by tweet as she was testifying last week.

That attack prompted accusations of witness intimidation from Democrats and even some criticism from Republicans, who have been largely united in their defence of Mr. Trump.

“I think, along with most people, I find the President’s tweet generally unfortunate,” Republican Representative Mike Turner said on CNN’s State of the Union.

Story continues below advertisement

Still, he insisted tweets were “certainly not impeachable and it’s certainly not criminal. And it’s certainly not witness intimidation,” even if Ms. Yovanovitch said she felt intimidated by the attacks.

Republican Representative Chris Stewart said Mr. Trump “communicates in ways that sometimes I wouldn’t” but dismissed the significance of the attacks.

“If your basis for impeachment is going to include a tweet, that shows how weak the evidence for that impeachment is,” he said on ABC’s This Week.

And the backlash didn’t stop Mr. Trump from lashing out at yet another witness, this time Pence aide Ms. Williams. He directed her in a Sunday tweet to “meet with the other Never Trumpers, who I don’t know & mostly never even heard of, & work out a better presidential attack!”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies