Skip to main content

U.S. Politics Giuliani backtracks on comments that Trump sought deal for tower in Moscow throughout 2016

U.S. President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani backtracked on Monday from earlier comments that Mr. Trump pursued a business deal to erect a tower bearing his name in Moscow throughout 2016, saying his statements “were hypothetical and not based on conversations I had with the President.”

Mr. Giuliani told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday that Mr. Trump may have continued to pursue the project and had discussions about it with his former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, until as late as October or November, 2016, when Mr. Trump was closing in on his election victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Giuliani went a step further with the New York Times, where he quoted Mr. Trump saying the Trump Tower Moscow discussions were “going on from the day I announced to the day I won.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Moscow deal ultimately did not materialize, but Mr. Giuliani’s remarks suggest that Mr. Trump’s discussions about the project with Mr. Cohen may have dragged on until the election, raising new questions for congressional investigators looking into possible ties between the president and Russia.

Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee who appeared as a guest on the same show as Mr. Giuliani, said: “That is news to me. And that is big news.”

But in an e-mailed statement on Monday, Mr. Giuliani changed his story, saying, “My comments did not represent the actual timing or circumstances of any such discussions.”

An investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion between Moscow and Mr. Trump’s campaign has loomed large over the Trump presidency amid media reports of his team’s alleged connections with Russia.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter