Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Riot police officers clash with protesters in Hong Kong, on May 27, 2020. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Congress that the State Department no longer considered Hong Kong to have significant autonomy under Chinese rule.

LAM YIK FEI/The New York Times News Service

The Trump administration has declared that Hong Kong is no longer significantly independent of Beijing’s control, threatening to revoke the territory’s special trade and diplomatic status.

The move further ramps up tension between the two countries amid President Donald Trump’s long-running trade war and increasingly pointed criticism of China’s handling of the coronavirus epidemic.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Wednesday took aim at Beijing’s plan to impose a new security law on Hong Kong that could be used to crush pro-democracy protests. As a result of the law, he said, he would inform Congress that China had broken its promise to allow Hong Kong’s citizens to continue exercising democratic rights when Britain handed the former colony over to China in 1997.

Story continues below advertisement

“Beijing’s disastrous decision is only the latest in a series of actions that fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedoms,” he said in a statement. “While the United States once hoped that free and prosperous Hong Kong would provide a model for authoritarian China, it is now clear that China is modelling Hong Kong after itself.”

China is moving to impose a law on Hong Kong that would make it illegal to undermine Beijing’s authority. The territory’s democracy movement fears the new rules would be used to crack down on protests and campaigning ahead of legislative council elections next month.

Under the “one country, two systems” approach Beijing agreed to as part of the British handover, Hong Kong has some civil rights, including freedom of speech and an elected council, that mainland China does not.

The U.S., for its part, has continued to give Hong Kong the favourable treatment it enjoyed as a colony of the United Kingdom. The territory is not subject to many tariffs, export controls and investment limits that apply to Beijing. It also has an extradition treaty with the U.S.

Mr. Pompeo’s report to Congress is the first step necessary in rolling back that special status and treating Hong Kong the same as mainland China.

Bonnie Glaser, an expert on Chinese foreign and security policy, said the Trump administration was firing a warning shot in an effort to make Beijing back down. Ending Hong Kong’s special status would take more action from the White House, and potentially Congress, to alter specific commercial and diplomatic arrangements.

If the U.S. followed through on the threat, and repealed every special consideration it gives Hong Kong, the result might be drastic.

Story continues below advertisement

“It would change Hong Kong as we know it today. We’d probably see capital flight and American citizens leaving. It could be the end of Hong Kong as a financial hub in the region and the world," said Ms. Glaser, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank in Washington. “But there’s nothing inevitable about all of that. There are choices to be made here.”

In a statement, Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne said he was “deeply concerned” by China’s security law but he did not threaten any consequences for it. “Making such a law on Hong Kong without the direct participation of its people, legislature or judiciary would clearly undermine the ‘one country, two systems’ framework,” he said in a statement.

The U.S. and China have been locked in a trade war since 2018, when Mr. Trump imposed punitive tariffs on most Chinese exports. In recent weeks, the President had repeatedly excoriated Chinese officials for trying to cover up COVID-19 when it first emerged late last year.

Mr. Pompeo has defied China by cultivating closer ties with Taiwan, which Beijing views as a renegade province. Earlier this month, he castigated the World Health Organization for not inviting Taiwan to the World Health Assembly.

Derek Scissors, who studies China for the American Enterprise Institute think tank, said Beijing has looked increasingly emboldened in recent months and may be ready to accept U.S. punishment as the price of enforcing its control over Hong Kong. If Mr. Pompeo follows through on his threat, it could even provoke further retaliation from Beijing, he said.

Mr. Scissors pointed, for instance, to China’s increasingly strong language on Taiwan. In a speech Friday, Prime Minister Li Keqiang omitted the usual qualifier “peaceful” when describing his government’s desire to take control of the island.

Story continues below advertisement

“The fact that they’ve gone out of their way to show Taiwan that this is partly aimed at them tells me that this is at a level of seriousness that’s going to provoke the U.S.,” Mr. Scissors said. “Things can definitely get worse from here. This opens the door to a serious escalation.”

With a report from Robert Fife in Ottawa

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies